Unpopular opinion but true. We go from military insider to Quantum computer without evidence or mention by Q. There is no drop about a quantum computer being on the team. 10 ppl was clearly stated by Q.
I’m fairly new to this (last 6 months) & I haven’t read all the drops, so I am certainly no expert.
That being said, isn’t it possible, even reasonable and logical, that there is more to things than what Q shared?
I’m not saying guaranteed, but isn’t it conceivable Q shared just enough to persuade and enlighten, but not so much as to tip their hand to others?
Speculating about more beyond what Q shared seems reasonable to me because there has to be more. Simply, we don’t know what we don’t know and it’s only logical to accept that there is a lot we don’t know.
I see no harm in theorizing about what we don’t know. People, as always, should do their own research and decide for them selves what they believe to be true. Not extrapolating or considering beyond Q’s drops seems very limiting, IMHO.
That's misleading! Q stated "Less (sic) than 10" of whom 3 are non military. I know it's a really difficult calculation but think of a number between 3 and 9. That's the Q team.
Well, with a Looking Glass source, it isn't a bible, just extremely well informed... That alternative has not shown anymore possibilities- as stated, NCSWIC...
The comms of 2018 were mostly for 2018. You’re creating false narratives in your head with this method.
Unpopular opinion but true. We go from military insider to Quantum computer without evidence or mention by Q. There is no drop about a quantum computer being on the team. 10 ppl was clearly stated by Q.
I’m fairly new to this (last 6 months) & I haven’t read all the drops, so I am certainly no expert.
That being said, isn’t it possible, even reasonable and logical, that there is more to things than what Q shared?
I’m not saying guaranteed, but isn’t it conceivable Q shared just enough to persuade and enlighten, but not so much as to tip their hand to others?
Speculating about more beyond what Q shared seems reasonable to me because there has to be more. Simply, we don’t know what we don’t know and it’s only logical to accept that there is a lot we don’t know.
I see no harm in theorizing about what we don’t know. People, as always, should do their own research and decide for them selves what they believe to be true. Not extrapolating or considering beyond Q’s drops seems very limiting, IMHO.
Any more info shared would violate opsec... Just enough for us to dig into..and publish.
That's misleading! Q stated "Less (sic) than 10" of whom 3 are non military. I know it's a really difficult calculation but think of a number between 3 and 9. That's the Q team.
What about the deltas??? 1,2,and 3 year deltas prove the timeline aspect...
Someone wrote second impeachment in 2018. Implying they were predicting this last one. So there was a delta of some sort.
You guys are going in circles.
You’re treating the tweets like a bible.
Q isn’t god manufacturing the time line 3 years ahead. Especially in randomly connected happenings.
Well, with a Looking Glass source, it isn't a bible, just extremely well informed... That alternative has not shown anymore possibilities- as stated, NCSWIC...