Codemonkey being a glowie may be true - may be not. Can't be proven one way or another. That is your supposition
Q, in their complete brilliance, had a solution for people trying to hijack the movement. They decided we should be anonymous.
Everyone who we seriously suspect is part of the movement, all have one thing in common. They don't say they're part of the movement.
Take Flynn, for instance. There's another thread that his family is suing the MSM for claiming he is part of the Qanon movement.
Contrast that with Ron Watkins. He goes on HBO speaking for the movement. But there's a problem. You know his name.
You know his name = he's not anon.
So, my good anon, I have pre-empted your "is Ron glowie or not" argument by simply stating that he is not anonymous. There is Q and there is anon. He is neither.
Q, in their complete brilliance, had a solution for people trying to hijack the movement. They decided we should be anonymous.
Everyone who we seriously suspect is part of the movement, all have one thing in common. They don't say they're part of the movement.
Take Flynn, for instance. There's another thread that his family is suing the MSM for claiming he is part of the Qanon movement.
Contrast that with Ron Watkins. He goes on HBO speaking for the movement. But there's a problem. You know his name.
You know his name = he's not anon.
So, my good anon, I have pre-empted your "is Ron glowie or not" argument by simply stating that he is not anonymous. There is Q and there is anon. He is neither.