No.. Or at least in not regards to what people is claiming he said. They are claiming he said something he did not and it is fucking stupid. As if we need more shit like this to discredit us.
Mass, obvious genocide vs. slow, covert genocide? Still not seeing the difference here. 10%-15% reduction in population growth from doing “a really good job” with healthcare sounds worse than saying reduce the current population by that amount. Regardless, both options involve AT LEAST 10%-15% less people. It would be nice if you could explain why you are hung up on the methodology of reducing the population. Do you think people will just stop fucking when healthcare improves, because that is what causes the population to increase.
Now you are putting your own fantasy over reality (what was said).
Yes, that's the whole point of it. In places where they pump out babies because they have shit survival-rate, they will not need to do this anymore because of better conditions for survival.
Reducing growth does not involve killing anyone or doing anything other than not making more babies.
Again, BG is obviously evil, but don't need to make up shit he did not say. More than enough garbage quotes to use.
Ok, this is getting stupid..
People, he claimed that vaxx can decrease population GROWTH by 10 or 15 %, not decrease the population by that much...
Why are people who can't even read posting this shit over and over again?
I despise BG because he is a fucking thief and IP-troll, but he did not say what you claim he did..
No.. Or at least in not regards to what people is claiming he said. They are claiming he said something he did not and it is fucking stupid. As if we need more shit like this to discredit us.
What is the difference? We can take 10%-15% off the top or just pay as we go..?
The difference is genocide.
Mass, obvious genocide vs. slow, covert genocide? Still not seeing the difference here. 10%-15% reduction in population growth from doing “a really good job” with healthcare sounds worse than saying reduce the current population by that amount. Regardless, both options involve AT LEAST 10%-15% less people. It would be nice if you could explain why you are hung up on the methodology of reducing the population. Do you think people will just stop fucking when healthcare improves, because that is what causes the population to increase.
Now you are putting your own fantasy over reality (what was said).
Yes, that's the whole point of it. In places where they pump out babies because they have shit survival-rate, they will not need to do this anymore because of better conditions for survival.
Reducing growth does not involve killing anyone or doing anything other than not making more babies.
Again, BG is obviously evil, but don't need to make up shit he did not say. More than enough garbage quotes to use.