no there is no evidence you can point to models right that doesnt count. Just like there is no evidence we evolved from wet rocks. sorry bro look into Kurt Wise or Kent Hovind
No ur confused lol evidence is based on empirical science. Aka what can be known from observing. You never observed the age of the earth nor a wet rock making DNA. Time to hit the books baby
There's quite a lot of evidence. Maybe you think there is no "proof" but radiocarbon dating is evidence, stratigraphic superposition is evidence.
Yea in your mind that constitues evidence I truly believe you are being honest
no there is no evidence you can point to models right that doesnt count. Just like there is no evidence we evolved from wet rocks. sorry bro look into Kurt Wise or Kent Hovind
I think you are confused by the terms evidence and proof.
Also the first cell likely came from protobionts not "wet rocks."
No ur confused lol evidence is based on empirical science. Aka what can be known from observing. You never observed the age of the earth nor a wet rock making DNA. Time to hit the books baby
You can observe the predictability of dating radioactive isotopes, and from that infer the age of the Earth. Which is much older than 10,000 years.
Carbon dating is accurate for up to 30,000 years, once again one can infer that the age of the Earth is older than 10,000 years.