Now that I look at it closer, the Q posts treat Durham not as a person but as an operation. Language like "Durham Start" and "Month/Day 'Durham' initiated?" comes to mind.
I'm also beginning to see that Q may have been pointing to Durham not as an enabling factor but as an obstacle in getting things moving. In this light, the seemingly random Q statements about Durham make more sense, such as the one about the "DECLAS CoC" where Barr turned out to be somewhat useless: Q3784.
There is also the fact that any photo-video media of Durham is being recycled over and over. Compare for example this 2021 news video and this undated photo, and take note of the microphone, archway and people: they both belong to the exact same scene.
It is extremely hard to believe that in over a decade of ever-improving camera tech, ever-increasing journalists, and an ever-growing library of media content, they had to resort to 13-year-old footage of Durham to illustrate who he is, and substandard footage at that. The camerawork looked as if it were staged on a movie set.
Now that I look at it closer, the Q posts treat Durham not as a person but as an operation. Language like "Durham Start" and "Month/Day 'Durham' initiated?" comes to mind.
https://qalerts.app/?q=durham
I'm also beginning to see that Q may have been pointing to Durham not as an enabling factor but as an obstacle in getting things moving. In this light, the seemingly random Q statements about Durham make more sense, such as the one about the "DECLAS CoC" where Barr turned out to be somewhat useless: Q3784.
There is also the fact that any photo-video media of Durham is being recycled over and over. Compare for example this 2021 news video and this undated photo, and take note of the microphone, archway and people: they both belong to the exact same scene.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i3pyCzMg/this-image-looks-staged-durham-i/
https://www.wtnh.com/news/connecticut/u-s-attorney-for-ct-john-durham-to-resign-sunday/
Hence, do a TinEye look up on the image and sort by oldest first. The image has hits from as far back as April 2008.
https://tineye.com/search/60d1dfb88a361892b018790b3d169d5f292d2f7b?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1
It is extremely hard to believe that in over a decade of ever-improving camera tech, ever-increasing journalists, and an ever-growing library of media content, they had to resort to 13-year-old footage of Durham to illustrate who he is, and substandard footage at that. The camerawork looked as if it were staged on a movie set.