We should form groups to practice hand-to-hand self defense programs. I just picked up several books about self defense and as our boy Salty pointed out in the stream they're waiting for a 2A loving patriot to shoot a BLM/Anti-Fa soldier so they can push the anti-2A shit. What if we get together in our communities and teach Americans to properly fight back without guns. If nothing else it makes our communities safer
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Martial arts were invented because wicked rulers prevented their peasants from owning weapons. The peasants picked up common farm tools and developed fighting styles to defend themselves against their tyrant rulers.
I would participate in that and still go to the shooting range ?.
Absolutely. I like the idea of getting red states to practice a type of civil spartanism. Where militia training and civil service is respected, expected and encouraged.
You don't kill a snake by fighting against it's individual scales or by attacking it's tail.
Learning hand to hand combat to take on the minions is just planning to attack the scales of the snake. Every animal knows that you go straight for the head and neck. Control of the entire snake only happens when the head is secured.
People pick up violent snakes all the time with their hand. Ask Florida Man and the Vietnamese guy on break at the sweat shop. ?
I would too but until we get back in power somehow we need to play smart. They want us to shoot them so they can push anti-2A propaganda and legislation. You don't do what the enemy want you to do lest you fall into a trap. You go where they are not and where they won't expect you. I think the first thing we should do if we win Congress is to remove as many gun restrictions as possible. Until then we need to watch, wait and be creative about self-defense and achieving our objectives. We know they'll come for the guns. Let's figure out ways to hide large amounts of weapons using out community connections. Let's figure out how to get automatics and stuff in the hands of more conservatives and let's push hand to hand training to defend against the inevitability of BLM/Aunt Queefa rioters infiltrating red states. They've already been causing ruckus in Kentucky and Tennessee.
It's always good to have some hand-to-hand skill. Up close, you're likely to be more effective with a knife than you are a gun.
I carry a 7-inch fixed blade, a spetsnaz shovel (nice and sharp) along with my handgun. The shovel is hard to conceal but the knife and gun are practically invisible, both tucked on side under my arms via concealed carry shirt.
Yeah. I carry a spring loaded retractable knife. I needed it because the Army hand to hand manual has a knife fighting stance and strikes as well as some grapples. The book recommended a double edged knife because with the stance in the book it allows you to slash in any direction without twisting your wrist. I wanted it retractable so that way an assailant wouldn't see it. should I need to use it.
I’m all for freedom of choice and am a knife collector, but this needs to be said. I highly recommend doing some more research if you think a knife is a good weapon for self defense. Legally of course it is a nightmare “why did you have an assassins weapon on you when attacked? Expecting trouble? Couldn’t have avoided it? Truly?”. Even at close range a gun is more effective especially in trained hands vs some pasty antifa fool with a sog pocket knife. With a knife unless you get the jump on your opponent and cut specific parts it will take like 30 seconds to stop someone. Set a timer for 30 seconds and imagine what a hard ass biker that is now fighting for his life could do to you. A knife is surely better than nothing but I’d recommend looking into impact weapons or distraction weapons like tear gas or even a handful of coins to the face... then stab effectively or get away. My two cents. I’ve studied the subject a lot and would be wrong not to share...
Ohh yeah. I mean don't get me wrong if I had my way automatics wouldn't need any backgrounds checks but voting would, de-unionized schools would teach self defense classes in addition to pro-western academics and militia membership and training would be a social norm and the federal and state governments would take a hands off approach to firearms and militias and focus on economic/administrative tasks instead.
Get down on some BJJ and build friendships and yourself.
I picked up books on boxing and a (possibly dated) book of the US Department of Army hand-to hand combat. One of the stances in boxing is actually very similar to the main stance in the Army Training. The Peekaboo guard. I'm working on melding the styles. I also focused on martial arts that are native to my family's home lands. The places we were from before we came here. Fencing (Which is Scottish) and Russian Sambo. We go back to when it was actually Bohemia. Like back when it was the crown lands and not Czechoslovakia but Sambo is the Slavic martial art.
Get Tough by William Fairbairn.
WW2 hand-to- hand training for the OSS and SOE.
Be able to take a punch, and memorize some breakfast cereals...FAFO
Absolutely. This is a priority imo, I know for this home, I feel its a necessary life skill. I love the group idea too
Yeah. Like I said above. I like the idea of making red states the absolute antithesis of the blue states in terms of social norms. Civic spartanism. The schools do not teach self defense. At least where I'm from they don't. You'd think that a bunch of unionized anti-2A teachers would at least be on board with teaching students how to disarm an attacker but no. That's to western, white and masculine. Until the schools teach the kids how to defend themselves with their hands I don't buy any of their bullshit. If they do that then I'll know we've returned to our traditional western roots.