For anyone that thinks Durham is fake, he isn't.. 1972 Colgate University graduation picture..
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Archived:
https://archive.is/W0Ysb (Left page only)
https://archive.is/TwJpy (Right page only)
Source (Warning: These may load like a brick due to YUGE file sizes. I have broken these links to discourage trigger-happy clicking in case either the hosting server or your network connection or your own PC resource usage complains. The Archive.is links should be sufficient):
https://digitalcollections.colgate.edu/ iiif/2/studentyearbooks:40361~JP2/full/pct:100/0/default.jpg (Left Page: 3779x5002)
https://digitalcollections.colgate.edu/ iiif/2/studentyearbooks:40446~JP2/full/pct:100/0/default.jpg (Right Page: 3786x4977)
via https://digitalcollections.colgate.edu/ object/studentyearbooks40270
via https://digitalcollections.colgate.edu/ collections/colgate-university-student-yearbooks?page=5&display=grid
FotoForensics Analysis on left-page source image file (note: I do not know how to fully utilize this.)
https://www.fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=25696c71957c3dc7595ca9b8506e818b0027efe4.2211585
To me the digital record checks out. There is however a possibility that the original document itself was doctored at the pre-print level, for example in the case that the CIA had the foresight to 'plant' Durham here to later pass Durham off (if manufactured) as real.