PSA: things include dates. Dates are often relevant. If you've just found something from 5 years ago, awesome, share it if it's relevant- but don't label it as breaking news. This is supposed to be a place dedicated to serious discernment. I dont know if it's just shills but we seem to be completely incapable of telling when something is "recent". As if the 3 seconds checking the date found at the top of the article is just to much to think about before coming in for those sweet imaginary internet points. I dont get it. Unless it's a purposeful shill tactic [share posts and get up numbers in an attempt to "blend" when shooting your doom load later]
Maybe requiring a date in titles with a link could be a course of action. It would cut down drastically on confusion, misinformation, etc as we go into the portion where we're looking for the most clarity.
Right?
PSA: things include dates. Dates are often relevant. If you've just found something from 5 years ago, awesome, share it if it's relevant- but don't label it as breaking news. This is supposed to be a place dedicated to serious discernment. I dont know if it's just shills but we seem to be completely incapable of telling when something is "recent". As if the 3 seconds checking the date found at the top of the article is just to much to think about before coming in for those sweet imaginary internet points. I dont get it. Unless it's a purposeful shill tactic [share posts and get up numbers in an attempt to "blend" when shooting your doom load later]
Maybe requiring a date in titles with a link could be a course of action. It would cut down drastically on confusion, misinformation, etc as we go into the portion where we're looking for the most clarity.