Well.. first off physics and gravity dont support your views. Secondly feel free to show us the giant hunks taken out of building 7.
Show us the the missing chunks. Maybe that would help explain why the Fairbanks study stated Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
Maybe a huge chunk from one of the other buildings hit every column of building 7 simultaneously?
also... when you exceed the carrying capacity for a system, the system fails.
the supports were designed to function as a whole system, the damage created a system in distress... point loading on areas of the structure they weren't designed to handle... not just vertical load... but now torsion and pulling and shear loads...
then you set it on fire and cook the metal... which is under more stress than it's designed to carry.
wtf did you think was going to happen?
you can't remove a big chunk of the buildings foundation, set it on fire, then expect it to continue holding the same load.
if you take a wheel off your car it's going to lean... cars weigh a ton or so... skyscrapers weigh millions of tons.
guess which one has more mass and thus more force being exerted?
do you honestly think buildings were designed to have a bunch of load bearing supports removed and still function as intended? after they cook in a fire?
but it's fine man, you can believe dumb retarded shit all you want, it's what makes this country so great.
These physicists maintain all three were a controlled demolition. That study I posted stated all columns of bldg 7 were felled at once. What did YOU NOT understand about that?
Those buildings were also designed to withstand impact actually. The structure of those buildings would turn those planes into dust. Theres an angle of the buildings exploding where you can see the controlled demo running up and down the building. There was also PLENTY of sketchy activity going on with those buildings before this all happened. If those planes really hit the buildings, it would be really difficult for the hijackers to survive....which they did. In fact the US had to settle out of court for accusing those men for 9/11 because they were pakistani citizens i believe. I may be mistaken on the country but they were professional pilots in their country.
Well.. first off physics and gravity dont support your views. Secondly feel free to show us the giant hunks taken out of building 7.
Show us the the missing chunks. Maybe that would help explain why the Fairbanks study stated Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
Maybe a huge chunk from one of the other buildings hit every column of building 7 simultaneously?
#science4dummies #Physicsforthoseolderthan5
lol, excuse me? how exactly do "physics and gravity don't support your views"
gonna need some receipts bro.
here's the damage to 7 https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IGZLkbR7jWs/RhFoa84wgRI/AAAAAAAAAFs/m_BhJvzFi2w/s400/combo-small.jpg
also... when you exceed the carrying capacity for a system, the system fails.
the supports were designed to function as a whole system, the damage created a system in distress... point loading on areas of the structure they weren't designed to handle... not just vertical load... but now torsion and pulling and shear loads...
then you set it on fire and cook the metal... which is under more stress than it's designed to carry.
wtf did you think was going to happen?
you can't remove a big chunk of the buildings foundation, set it on fire, then expect it to continue holding the same load.
if you take a wheel off your car it's going to lean... cars weigh a ton or so... skyscrapers weigh millions of tons.
guess which one has more mass and thus more force being exerted?
do you honestly think buildings were designed to have a bunch of load bearing supports removed and still function as intended? after they cook in a fire?
but it's fine man, you can believe dumb retarded shit all you want, it's what makes this country so great.
keep reaching for those rainbows hashtagfag.
Lol! Tell us all about your 'physics'.
Here. This article links to a respected REAL physics journal. https://thefreethoughtproject.com/physics-report-911-controlled-demolition/
These physicists maintain all three were a controlled demolition. That study I posted stated all columns of bldg 7 were felled at once. What did YOU NOT understand about that?
Are your physics magical physics specific to you?
See. I can post blogs too... http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/45487
Those buildings were also designed to withstand impact actually. The structure of those buildings would turn those planes into dust. Theres an angle of the buildings exploding where you can see the controlled demo running up and down the building. There was also PLENTY of sketchy activity going on with those buildings before this all happened. If those planes really hit the buildings, it would be really difficult for the hijackers to survive....which they did. In fact the US had to settle out of court for accusing those men for 9/11 because they were pakistani citizens i believe. I may be mistaken on the country but they were professional pilots in their country.