Or stop downvoting the idea that he may not be real. GEOTUS is asking the question too (was that statement real?)
This forum shouldn't be about dogmatic clinging to beliefs, it should be about processing new information and research with an open mind.
If Durham isn't real, that doesn't mean there's no Plan or there's no arrests or you're getting a jab and a passport. Don't hold a singular image of what this looks like and reject information that challenges it. None of us expected and Q never suggested Biden would "win" 2020.
So post a video of a notable public figure giving a single press conference or walking down a hallway, or OPEN YOUR MIND.
Isn't that why we come here?
When you say he is real, do you mean you've seen him with your own two eyes, in the flesh, beard, glasses and suit? What were the articles about, roughly speaking, and what do you know about him? What do you think about the scrubbing of information about him on the web?
I lean towards him being not real because a 2021 news report about his resignation used footage dating back to 2008. If he is real, why would that news station then air 13-year-old footage? Even if he doesn't seek the limelight, the disparity is too great to cross comfortably. But I do know from my own defense of George News that if Durham is genuinely real and you yourself know it and the subtleties, and you know it to be critically important that we know he is real, then you must fight for that truth.
What do you make of his info being scrubbed, right down to his verifiability? Now I'm not trying to attack you; I'm genuinely trying to wrap my head around Durham because I'm perplexed at how hard it is to even verify his identity. I'm still open to the opposite of my current position that doubts that he even exists, especially in light of Trump's statements re: Durham.
It could very well be though that we simply don't have enough information available to come to any conclusions.