https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/145/365/1399238/ The law as stated by the Court in United States v. Johnson, supra, is applicable here:

"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. *367 **It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person.** * * * The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies as to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus."