From I’ve watched so far. The guy is desperately going behind whoever he interviews to get who is Q. He in one scene was talking to a Qtuber. And the Qtuber said “I think Roger stone is one of the Qs”. Then he thinks codemonkeys dad is Q because of his pen collection and Goldwater news site they had. He just thought it was suspicious that code monkeys dad said he was not into politics. Then the one that got me the most that seemed pretty close idk if it’s true their was no video just some audio. The narrator explaining where codemonkeys said Q’s IP was coming from. And it was where Steve Bannons house was sounded pretty damn close. It got me thinking it makes sense. But again no real definitive proof of who Q is. But I think he could be close or far off idk. If you think about it would be the one top person closest to trump to get the Q intel. Thought it was interesting thought I would share.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
So far it makes Q supporters look like idiots. I’m shocked at how much truth they are telling but it’s really trying to make people look crazy.
This is good actually. Normies come for the crazie and stay for the redpills.
Exactly people get curious of what journalist talk about and that’s a pretty damn good red pill. At least a good chunk of their millions of viewers are gonna check the websites he refers to. That’s a pretty good redpill imo. Not the best but pretty good.
The people they decided for the interview definitely makes everyone else look like idiots it’s really dumb. I also didn’t like the fact they show clips of crazy Q people and they might have well been saying this is what dangerous ideas look like. Instead of saying yeah their are crazy people and yeah free speech comes with a price sometimes. But they aren’t going to ever say anything that goes against their narrative as always.
i don't have real hope for this to be good for us but it would be really cool if the final pair next week is some big turnaround in the framing of things
Those are the REAL conspiracy theorists
Yeah journalists are the type of people that have to go by what the company paying him are wanting him to say. I’m sure his intent before he was bought out was for unbiased I hope. But I really don’t know because I don’t know this guy. But codemonkeys says he’s unbiased so maybe while he was filming it he was and then editing day came and they go with this type of narrative.
Yeah its entertaining but pretty weak sauce I think. He didn't do much digging it seems to me, I think you have to fully embrace the movement to understand what they are talking about otherwise it is stupid and the watcher never understands the magic. I thought it was interesting about the Steve Bannon thing as well. I think it could also be one of the many people that were part of Wikileaks and never really got to get some of that Intel out and so they created this weird way of getting people attracted to what is going on.
Yeah his digging in a journalist way made sense I guess. But yeah I agree he could have done better in a lot of areas. I think his whole are you Q!? Are you!?Was kinda funny and right fully so. You wanna see the persons reaction to the question. I wish he did it with more fresh pair of eyes. Steve Bannon thing was really interesting I wonder where he takes this in the next episodes. I hope he leaves it off at what do you think viewers?
Yeah. Do we have to begin every post with "yeah"?
Its like a Whodunnit. The obsession to find Q. I watched the first 2 episodes. Almost the whole of 2nd episode is about the history of 2 channel, 4chan, 8chan, Ron Watkins, his dad etc. Nothing to do with Q.
He had an aim with the history, it was to say Q is a joke on 8 chan by 4 chan.
Yeah I think his intentions was to see if the website itself had intended of trying to boosts its user ship up based on a conspiracy alone. But I think this all happens by Q alone. I think the people running 8kun are definitely business men and slightly odd characters. but don’t have the English level to write a Q post like that. Nor the military knowledge.
In the 1st episode I actually thought he was going to be unbiased but now that I've watched all four, I can see that's not true.
Hmmmm? Bannon. Didn’t he have legal problems with the “We fund the wall”group?
It sounds like a lot of random guessing which tells me they didnt want to say they have no clue.