Patent law does not allow for someone to patent or own a living organism. However, we have seen companies such as Monsanto modify the genetics of plants to make them grow with less water and that allows them to patent and own the genetically modified thing.
If you apply the same concept to those who are taking mRNA vaccines, they could be considered property of the pharma companies.
In this twisted clown world, I would not put it past someone to try this and claim everyone who took said vaccine is now owned by these sick people. Vaccine yourself and you just signed up to be a slave. No thanks.
UNC Health website says that the shot "teaches" our cells to make the virus spike proteins to spark the production of antibodies. Proteins are manufactured using instructions in our DNA. The only way to "teach" a cell to manufacture new proteins is to modify the DNA. The only way.
Also, the birth certificate crap is crap. My name isn't in all caps on my birth certificate, and there is no "serial number" either. The original was handwritten in cursive, and certified copies are typed, not in all caps, and there's still no "serial number." The paper is not special banker paper either. It's printed at the local printer, and has been for over 100 years.
This has nothing to do with reality. I have injected cells with mRNA and have caused them to express a desired protein. I have done it many times. This is very basic cell biology.
If you want a cell to permanently express a certain protein you have to alter the DNA. In order to make that happen in a predictable way requires ingredients that are not in any of the vaccines (as listed).
My name is in all caps on mine. There is no serial number, but I have never heard anyone mention a serial number until you did just now. The unique identifier on my birth certificate is the time, date, place of birth, and name. I also have a SSN which I suppose is more like a serial number, but its not really necessary, since my birth certificate is a unique identifier.
Most of the videos about the birth certificate crap talk about the serial numbers. And they claim that all birth certificates have the names in all caps.
Most birth certificates from the 60s on back were handwritten, therefore not in all caps. I didn't have an SSN when I was born either. I got that when I needed it for work.
The video I saw about the all caps thing was the Jay-Gould thing (or whatever his name is), but that isn't really relevant. I came across the birth certificate thing doing independent research. A lot of birth certificates are all caps from what I have seen. Perhaps it has to do with when and where. I was born in a big city. Perhaps it began in larger cities before trickling out.
Regardless of the all caps thing, that is not really relevant to birth certificates being papers of ownership. Birth certificates started around the same time that the Federal Reserve and Income Tax came into existence. This is what gives strong support for them being papers of ownership, not the other crap that I don't really know, nor care about.
Birth certificates started before the Fed and income tax. My state started in 1911, and some states started even back into the 1800s.
I've done genealogy research in a lot of places. I've never seen a single birth certificate with the name in all caps. The only place I've seen them is in those videos where they show birth certificates that look more like stock certificates, and are like nothing I've ever seen in a courthouse or register of deeds office.
The origin of putting names in all caps on some documents is to make them stand out, as there was no boldface on typewriters. Now, with computers, names could be printed in boldface or even in color, but the habit of all caps lives on, mainly because lawyers don't change much. You can look at a property deed from 200 years ago and a new one, and a lot of the language is identical. I once worked in law, so I know.