Fauci “predicted” the “virus” in 2017 (I believe correct year). It was conjured up years ago, not sure if it’s an actual new virus or and old one revamped. People will be angry if they lost a loved one to a virus that is nonexistent.
An designed and intentionally released virus is what the evidence suggests has happened. I do not understand why so many people want to believe it doesn't exist at all. I guess that's just what happens in a disinformation war. There will be people believing many different narratives, all looking at each other as suspect. That is a Luciferian victory condition.
This is why its so important to use critical thinking on evidence, and not dismiss it purely because you don't like the source for unrelated reasons. Always listen to the message, and don't shoot the messenger.
As example, anytime I link anything even remotely traceable back to the CDC people freak out, yet if you look at the CDC data it destroys its own narrative. Isn't data that destroys its own narrative even MORE convincing than a "trusted" site doing so?
Fauci “predicted” the “virus” in 2017 (I believe correct year). It was conjured up years ago, not sure if it’s an actual new virus or and old one revamped. People will be angry if they lost a loved one to a virus that is nonexistent.
They should be angrier if they lost a loved one to a virus that was intentionally designed and released on the global population.
An designed and intentionally released virus is what the evidence suggests has happened. I do not understand why so many people want to believe it doesn't exist at all. I guess that's just what happens in a disinformation war. There will be people believing many different narratives, all looking at each other as suspect. That is a Luciferian victory condition.
This is why its so important to use critical thinking on evidence, and not dismiss it purely because you don't like the source for unrelated reasons. Always listen to the message, and don't shoot the messenger.
As example, anytime I link anything even remotely traceable back to the CDC people freak out, yet if you look at the CDC data it destroys its own narrative. Isn't data that destroys its own narrative even MORE convincing than a "trusted" site doing so?
You’re absolutely right, but it’s seems they still don’t see it as we do here..... frustrating how naive people are.