According to Mr Kent Dunn, "Covid-19 vaccine, second shot, may NOT be able to recover from this, even in Med-Bed technology. The second shot, a common reaction is stroke or heart problems."
That data is 100% accurate. These are bioweapons that irrevocably alters every strand of DNA in the body.
Please disseminate:
First, that is not what they say, nor is it what I say, nor it is what any other cell biologist says. What we all say is that cytosolic mRNA (messenger RNA the type in the vaccines) cannot alter your DNA. This is a 100% true statement (within the scope of any meaningful discussion). OTHER types of RNA can write to DNA, albeit under very specific conditions which have nothing to do with the vaccine.
Second, this article (and indeed most papers you will find on RNA/DNA interaction) is talking about a specific modification to a specific type of RNA that INTERACTS with DNA in a REGULATORY CAPACITY. That has absolutely nothing to do with altering the genome, but strictly related to regulation of protein expression.
We can be certain because we have done experiments on it. Thousands of experiments. Maybe millions. Is it POSSIBLE for the viral mRNA to interfere with normal DNA traslation, or even be written to the DNA according to these millions of experiments?
Yes.
Is it likely?
You are probably more likely to get hit by lightning 20 times before finishing this sentence with a cloudless sky than you are for even one of your cells to have the vaccine mRNA get written to your DNA.
I really wish people who are completely clueless about biology would move on to relevant vaccine topics. Its like playing Whack O' Mole.
There are plethoric numbers of vaccinated people who have had vaccine titers proving that there was NO antibody response to the "vaccine."
Ergo, the introduction of viral RNA did not occur. Big pharma admitted that their mRNA was derived from a foreign source which is unique among vaccine preparations. Exactly, what is the end goal if it is definitively not to stimulate an immune response?
Recommend that you troll elsewhere as we are highly educated individuals that WILL NOT be dissuaded with your specious claims.
What?
Nothing you are saying has anything to do with what I said.
Please give me an example where this has anything to do with anything I said.
Stimulating an immune response is absolutely the goal of these vaccines. If they are not doing it, that is a failing of their intent. How does that have anything to do with anything I said?
People believe that these vaccines are intended to alter our genome. This is disinformation that has been commonly used to spread fear. If our job is not to help those believing disinformation, then what is the entire point of Q?
As for "highly educated" I have yet to encounter another cell biologist or bio-nanotechnology researcher (what I am) on these boards. When I do, then I will finally get some help stopping this disinformation campaign.
If you think I am making "specious claims" please provide a specific grievance and I will provide evidence for any claim I make.
Hi Slyver, I appreciate your insight here.
What is your take on the potential long term affects of synthetic mRNA being injected into the body?
Is this not a large scale experiment?
Do you believe that the mRNA injection + “variants” and “vaccine passports” are part of the globalist control plan, and the “precipice of destruction?”
mRNA in general or this specific mRNA?
In general it would depend on what the protein is the mRNA creates. In general I don't have any problem with injecting mRNA into cells to do some specific task. However, these techniques need to be approached with great caution (and lots of testing) because biology is complex, and reactions are rarely exactly as we expect them to be, especially across a large genetic and health diverse population.
Specific to these coronavirus vaccines I am concerned about something called pathogenic priming that all previous coronavirus vaccines have suffered from. (A "cold" is a coronavirus. We have been working on coronavirus vaccines for decades). In previous vaccines this has caused something called a cytokine storm which is an extreme autoimmune response when a participant later encounters the real virus that can be lethal. Death occurred on average in about 5% of the participants (animal and/or human) in all previous vaccine studies. This is why we say "there is no cure for the common cold."
These current vaccines did not go through animal trials to test for this particular known effect (this is a crime against humanity/violation of the Nuremberg code). This does not mean these vaccines will also suffer from this at the same rate as previous ones did, but it does concern me. We are unlikely to know for a while the outcome of this particular experiment. The whole human race is the experiment this time, instead of a small animal group.
Fortunately I am in the control group.
As for the actual mRNA molecule itself, I am completely unconcerned. Their half-life is a couple days and they are likely completely gone in a week or so.
To my knowledge, this is the largest experiment ever done. There are several violations of the Nuremberg code going on. There will be charges of crimes against humanity against many people when all is said and done (assuming we win the war).
Yes.