According to Mr Kent Dunn, "Covid-19 vaccine, second shot, may NOT be able to recover from this, even in Med-Bed technology. The second shot, a common reaction is stroke or heart problems."
That data is 100% accurate. These are bioweapons that irrevocably alters every strand of DNA in the body.
Please disseminate:
There is no logical connection between this
and this
It is standard knowledge in cell and molecular biology that cytosolic mRNA does not (cannot) write to DNA. There is zero evidence that the mRNA vaccines alter DNA in any way.
Causing damage to organs via an autoimmune response has nothing to do with altering DNA of the cells, but rather from the body attacking the cells, which is what these vaccines are designed to do. They are proving to be bad tech, but not because they write to DNA (because they don't).
Actually, it is almost certainly underreported.
It is NOT an autoimmune response. This bioweapon causes pancytopenia and Hemophagocytichistiocytosis which rapidly destroys the entire immunological system.
Congratulations, you have ONE thing correct: The CDC expostulates that self-reporting on VAERS could be as low as ONE PERCENT of actual adverse events. When all is revealed, remaining humanity will know that this was an absolute holocaust
First, please provide evidence that the vaccines cause those specific diseases. Second, hemophagocytosis is an autoimmune disease. Third, my post was about RNA/DNA interaction. Fourth, there are several aberrant autoimmune responses this vaccine is causing. Fifth, an autoimmune response is what the vaccine is designed to elicit.
Again, you seem to be responding to someone else, or are otherwise incapable of reading what I am writing. Perhaps you should take a moment and actually read what I have written in my first post before responding with your angry and off topic diatribe again.
Your comments are farcical and grossly INACCURATE. You ARE NOT in any branch of medicine which makes you a rather intellectually challenged POSER.
Tell me: YES OR NO. Have you been fully "vaccinated" against SARS-CoV-2. If so, POST a photo of the front and back of your CDC Vaccine card in the next 2 hours.
Autoimmune Disorders are a DYSREGULATION of the immunological system wherein it attacks the body as foreign material. Viruses, heavy metals, prions and bacteria are PROVEN to cause these disorders.
Conversely, an autoimmune RESPONSE is an appropriate and DESIRED outcome such as a vaccine enabling the immune system to form antibodies without serious, untoward effects.
HERE IS THE COUPE DE GRACE: stateofthenation.co/?p=56522 MODERNA CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER ADMITS MRNA ALTERS DNA
Openvaers.com/COVID-DATA 50,861 Reports of untoward reactions in TWO MONTHS 2246 Deaths
NO vaccine has had these stats within the first two months. NONE. The fact is, these C19 are nit vaccines, they are bioweapons designed to kill millions of people.
Now, that is what I call VINDICATION
This is my LAST POST to you. I wish you good luck and good health.
I would like to ask you to read all of this before having an emotional response. That is the only way to get the full context of my words. Perhaps I should have started with what I said at the end, but I will do it this way instead.
I'm not sure why you have made all the assumptions you have made, nor am I sure why you are so emotionally invested in your beliefs, but lets break it down a little bit.
You are correct, I'm not a medical doctor. In my experience medical doctors, unless they are a specialist in certain fields (oncology, immunology, etc.), or are also researchers (M.D., Ph.D.) are generally ill-informed of both cell biology and bio-nanotechnology. I am a researcher in those fields.
I have not gotten the vaccine. I'm not sure how that would be in any way relevant to our conversation. They will have to kill me before they get their needle in me.
Autoimmune ANYTHING means the bodies immune system attacking itself. Everything you are saying after that completely misunderstands everything about "autoimmune" and the immune system itself.
Except that he never says anything like that. The author of that article completely misinterprets his words out of ignorance, or malice. Probably the former, but who knows.
What he is actually doing is comparing mRNA to software. This is a pretty accurate description. You can think of DNA as information stored on a hard drive, and software as a copy of that information being loaded into RAM to run. In the same way, the mRNA is a copy of the hard drive information (DNA), sent out (uploaded) of the nucleus into the cytosol (two topologically distinct and strictly gated areas of the cell) and there, in the cytosol, it runs the program. When he speaks about changing the "code" he is speaking of this SOFTWARE code. It is a pretty accurate way of thinking of it. At no point does he speak about or, in context, mean changing the information on the hard drive.
You can believe whatever you want. You can justify any fear you want. As a cell biologist with a decade of experience in studying and running experiments in cell biology I can tell you your beliefs and fears on this matter have nothing to do with reality. But again, believe what you wish.
Yup, and it is likely underreported.
While I think this vaccine is more dangerous than previous ones reported on VAERS, I think those were likely even MORE underreported than the coronavirus ones.
You seem to think that because I am trying to use my many years of relevant experience to dissuade disinformation, that I am pro vaccine. Nothing could be further from the truth. These vaccines, and their rollout constitute multiple violations of the Nuremberg code and are crimes against humanity. A sizable part of my life right now is dedicated to stopping people from taking them. But in order to do so, my words must be truth, not lies or disinformation. Spreading lies or disinformation which are easily proven incorrect (especially by people in my field) is completely counterproductive to my goal, our goal.