According to Mr Kent Dunn, "Covid-19 vaccine, second shot, may NOT be able to recover from this, even in Med-Bed technology. The second shot, a common reaction is stroke or heart problems."
That data is 100% accurate. These are bioweapons that irrevocably alters every strand of DNA in the body.
Please disseminate:
I would like to ask you to read all of this before having an emotional response. That is the only way to get the full context of my words. Perhaps I should have started with what I said at the end, but I will do it this way instead.
I'm not sure why you have made all the assumptions you have made, nor am I sure why you are so emotionally invested in your beliefs, but lets break it down a little bit.
You are correct, I'm not a medical doctor. In my experience medical doctors, unless they are a specialist in certain fields (oncology, immunology, etc.), or are also researchers (M.D., Ph.D.) are generally ill-informed of both cell biology and bio-nanotechnology. I am a researcher in those fields.
I have not gotten the vaccine. I'm not sure how that would be in any way relevant to our conversation. They will have to kill me before they get their needle in me.
Autoimmune ANYTHING means the bodies immune system attacking itself. Everything you are saying after that completely misunderstands everything about "autoimmune" and the immune system itself.
Except that he never says anything like that. The author of that article completely misinterprets his words out of ignorance, or malice. Probably the former, but who knows.
What he is actually doing is comparing mRNA to software. This is a pretty accurate description. You can think of DNA as information stored on a hard drive, and software as a copy of that information being loaded into RAM to run. In the same way, the mRNA is a copy of the hard drive information (DNA), sent out (uploaded) of the nucleus into the cytosol (two topologically distinct and strictly gated areas of the cell) and there, in the cytosol, it runs the program. When he speaks about changing the "code" he is speaking of this SOFTWARE code. It is a pretty accurate way of thinking of it. At no point does he speak about or, in context, mean changing the information on the hard drive.
You can believe whatever you want. You can justify any fear you want. As a cell biologist with a decade of experience in studying and running experiments in cell biology I can tell you your beliefs and fears on this matter have nothing to do with reality. But again, believe what you wish.
Yup, and it is likely underreported.
While I think this vaccine is more dangerous than previous ones reported on VAERS, I think those were likely even MORE underreported than the coronavirus ones.
You seem to think that because I am trying to use my many years of relevant experience to dissuade disinformation, that I am pro vaccine. Nothing could be further from the truth. These vaccines, and their rollout constitute multiple violations of the Nuremberg code and are crimes against humanity. A sizable part of my life right now is dedicated to stopping people from taking them. But in order to do so, my words must be truth, not lies or disinformation. Spreading lies or disinformation which are easily proven incorrect (especially by people in my field) is completely counterproductive to my goal, our goal.
NO, I am not reading your entire missive.
You are advocating DEATH for people yet, you will not take this bioweapon which you profess fealty towards. You have achieved no degree in any of the medical sciences, that is abundantly clear.
Goodbye.
I answered it almost immediately. I recommend you read what I wrote.
Not one thing here has anything to do with reality. I recommend you read what I wrote.
You can't have a communication if you aren't willing to listen. I listened to everything you have said, completely. I would appreciate it if you would do the same. Everything you have said about me has been the opposite of the truth.