Or, this is just a normal technique used daily across the world.
Are you suggesting nothing like this happened in April? March? February? 2018? 2017?
It wasn't engineered, the left just makes ammunition out of whatever is going on, regardless of whether it makes sense or not. If it was engineered they wouldn't have released a tox report that damning, or had it been an approved technique for solid reasons, or had Floyd say he can't breath while he was still in the car. If it was engineered they'd have done it in a way that would leave us no defense so they could push through their defund goals without resistance.
You folks need to learn to better vet evidence. You all keep looking for positive correlation but that's not how hypothesis testing works - you don't go looking to prove a theory (oh look, there were additional similar events around this date!) but you should instead try and disprove it (weird, nothing like this ever occurs then suddenly there were three events within days and the US even only happened after the other two failed to achieve desired results). You need a negative control, a baseline to compare about. Were these three events unusual or the norm? You never asked, you never investigated.
Falsifiability, but the inability to do so is the characteristic of a good theory. This one is garbage.
Or, this is just a normal technique used daily across the world.
Are you suggesting nothing like this happened in April? March? February? 2018? 2017?
It wasn't engineered, the left just makes ammunition out of whatever is going on, regardless of whether it makes sense or not. If it was engineered they wouldn't have released a tox report that damning, or had it been an approved technique for solid reasons, or had Floyd say he can't breath while he was still in the car. If it was engineered they'd have done it in a way that would leave us no defense so they could push through their defund goals without resistance.
You folks need to learn to better vet evidence. You all keep looking for positive correlation but that's not how hypothesis testing works - you don't go looking to prove a theory (oh look, there were additional similar events around this date!) but you should instead try and disprove it (weird, nothing like this ever occurs then suddenly there were three events within days and the US even only happened after the other two failed to achieve desired results). You need a negative control, a baseline to compare about. Were these three events unusual or the norm? You never asked, you never investigated.
Falsifiability, but the inability to do so is the characteristic of a good theory. This one is garbage.