The Kubrick rabbit hole is deep. I only grasp pieces of it, and take film criticism seriously so won't personally talk about something I'm not comfortable being expert on.
I will say Think MIRROR absolutely applies, literally, to his works.
For anyone interested film critic and all around smart guy Rob Ager has some SUPERB video and text essays on a lot of Kubrick's work. A lot of it is free, but I keep meaning to buy the paywall stuff - it's that good.
He points out a lot of the pedo / globalist imagery embedded in Kubrick's film, without him really being aware of all the stuff Q talks about. His The Shining analysis is the best around on the free web and is an incredibly interesting and entertaining dive.
I can barely get my alleged "cinefile"
friends to look and it's frustrating purely from a film analysis standpoint, much less the Exposing the Cabal angle. But I guess that's a good example of the lack of analytical curiosity of most people. Can't blame 'em, but it bums me out
Reiterating: His work on The Shining is the most interesting I've ever experienced. Granted, I haven't read any of the many books on the subject Ager references (this guy did his own independent research at Stanley Kubrick's personal archives for Lord's sake), many of which sound amazing.
If you're taking Kubrick - any of them. All are different, all are similiar, all are very good at least, and probably Great. I'm still evaluating him throughly; there's a ton to uncover.
Generally? I recommend Tarkovsky's "Stalker" to people who ask me. It is probably my favorite film. Some I recommend it to later agree. A lot don't. Lol.
Books - "Slaughterhouse Five" until I change my mind. There's a ton of great ones, but it's the easiest to disgest. And easy is always appreciated when it comes to great works of art. There's enough to gnaw on without a lot of complications.
The Kubrick rabbit hole is deep. I only grasp pieces of it, and take film criticism seriously so won't personally talk about something I'm not comfortable being expert on.
I will say Think MIRROR absolutely applies, literally, to his works.
For anyone interested film critic and all around smart guy Rob Ager has some SUPERB video and text essays on a lot of Kubrick's work. A lot of it is free, but I keep meaning to buy the paywall stuff - it's that good.
He points out a lot of the pedo / globalist imagery embedded in Kubrick's film, without him really being aware of all the stuff Q talks about. His The Shining analysis is the best around on the free web and is an incredibly interesting and entertaining dive.
http://www.collativelearning.com/
Comments like this make me very happy.
I can barely get my alleged "cinefile" friends to look and it's frustrating purely from a film analysis standpoint, much less the Exposing the Cabal angle. But I guess that's a good example of the lack of analytical curiosity of most people. Can't blame 'em, but it bums me out
Reiterating: His work on The Shining is the most interesting I've ever experienced. Granted, I haven't read any of the many books on the subject Ager references (this guy did his own independent research at Stanley Kubrick's personal archives for Lord's sake), many of which sound amazing.
Thanks again ?
Unfortunately, about a thousand of them.
If you're taking Kubrick - any of them. All are different, all are similiar, all are very good at least, and probably Great. I'm still evaluating him throughly; there's a ton to uncover.
Generally? I recommend Tarkovsky's "Stalker" to people who ask me. It is probably my favorite film. Some I recommend it to later agree. A lot don't. Lol.
Books - "Slaughterhouse Five" until I change my mind. There's a ton of great ones, but it's the easiest to disgest. And easy is always appreciated when it comes to great works of art. There's enough to gnaw on without a lot of complications.