Doubt it - my observation is they stalled long enough to replace all the ballots with what will appear to be 'clean' ballots. We've known about Jovan's technology for months - so have 'they'. Do you think 'they' just sat there and didn't take countermoves?
I listen to Pulitzer often (I subscribe to his youtube) - and while I agree that it can pick up many artifacts such as folding, whether a human made the marking or a machine, whether the paper is genuine, etc..... I don't think it's possible from scanning a piece of paper to know what happened to that paper between the factory and landing in the ballot pile. There would be no visual difference (artifacts etc...) on a piece of paper that was in an 'unopened' package that was sent to two different locations and then both sent to a single location before opening the package.
I've never heard Jovan even make such a claim. He does, however, claim that they can somehow tell if the paper was actually mailed - he's never explained how but I tend to trust him.
To be mailed as a ballot it will have creases from folding it to fit in the envelope. There are some who say they discovered pristine unfolded mail in ballots.
Quite possible. I honestly don't know. I just have a feeling they've been covering their tracks during the multi month coordinated delay just so when we finally get to examine the ballots, they are clean. Just my suspicion - I have no inside knowledge.
Doubt it - my observation is they stalled long enough to replace all the ballots with what will appear to be 'clean' ballots. We've known about Jovan's technology for months - so have 'they'. Do you think 'they' just sat there and didn't take countermoves?
I listen to Pulitzer often (I subscribe to his youtube) - and while I agree that it can pick up many artifacts such as folding, whether a human made the marking or a machine, whether the paper is genuine, etc..... I don't think it's possible from scanning a piece of paper to know what happened to that paper between the factory and landing in the ballot pile. There would be no visual difference (artifacts etc...) on a piece of paper that was in an 'unopened' package that was sent to two different locations and then both sent to a single location before opening the package.
I've never heard Jovan even make such a claim. He does, however, claim that they can somehow tell if the paper was actually mailed - he's never explained how but I tend to trust him.
To be mailed as a ballot it will have creases from folding it to fit in the envelope. There are some who say they discovered pristine unfolded mail in ballots.
I also hold out some hope.
Quite possible. I honestly don't know. I just have a feeling they've been covering their tracks during the multi month coordinated delay just so when we finally get to examine the ballots, they are clean. Just my suspicion - I have no inside knowledge.