Doubt it - my observation is they stalled long enough to replace all the ballots with what will appear to be 'clean' ballots. We've known about Jovan's technology for months - so have 'they'. Do you think 'they' just sat there and didn't take countermoves?
I listen to Pulitzer often (I subscribe to his youtube) - and while I agree that it can pick up many artifacts such as folding, whether a human made the marking or a machine, whether the paper is genuine, etc..... I don't think it's possible from scanning a piece of paper to know what happened to that paper between the factory and landing in the ballot pile. There would be no visual difference (artifacts etc...) on a piece of paper that was in an 'unopened' package that was sent to two different locations and then both sent to a single location before opening the package.
I've never heard Jovan even make such a claim. He does, however, claim that they can somehow tell if the paper was actually mailed - he's never explained how but I tend to trust him.
To be mailed as a ballot it will have creases from folding it to fit in the envelope. There are some who say they discovered pristine unfolded mail in ballots.
Quite possible. I honestly don't know. I just have a feeling they've been covering their tracks during the multi month coordinated delay just so when we finally get to examine the ballots, they are clean. Just my suspicion - I have no inside knowledge.
Doubt it - my observation is they stalled long enough to replace all the ballots with what will appear to be 'clean' ballots. We've known about Jovan's technology for months - so have 'they'. Do you think 'they' just sat there and didn't take countermoves?
I listen to Pulitzer often (I subscribe to his youtube) - and while I agree that it can pick up many artifacts such as folding, whether a human made the marking or a machine, whether the paper is genuine, etc..... I don't think it's possible from scanning a piece of paper to know what happened to that paper between the factory and landing in the ballot pile. There would be no visual difference (artifacts etc...) on a piece of paper that was in an 'unopened' package that was sent to two different locations and then both sent to a single location before opening the package.
I've never heard Jovan even make such a claim. He does, however, claim that they can somehow tell if the paper was actually mailed - he's never explained how but I tend to trust him.
To be mailed as a ballot it will have creases from folding it to fit in the envelope. There are some who say they discovered pristine unfolded mail in ballots.
This could absolutely be identified by the scan. However they've had 4 months to fold all of the ballots.......
I also hold out some hope.
Quite possible. I honestly don't know. I just have a feeling they've been covering their tracks during the multi month coordinated delay just so when we finally get to examine the ballots, they are clean. Just my suspicion - I have no inside knowledge.