Another example of Quackery from CNN and the left's reliance on quack science "consensus": Is it a surprise that the left spend their entire lives being confused about what is in their underwear and what it is used for ?
From CNN:
“It’s not possible to know a person’s gender identity at birth, and there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth,” Cole asserted, in a statement better fit for an unhinged opinion article than a news article by a breaking-news reporter.
CNN is a parody website pic.twitter.com/djUrqI0jlt
— B (@aheapofthings) March 30, 2021
In fact, as most of us are willing to acknowledge, for all of human history we’ve all relied upon a very simple way of actually knowing sex at birth.
There is indeed consensus for knowing biological sex at birth: just gotta look between the legs, it's really not that hard.
Another example of Quackery from CNN and the left's reliance on quack science "consensus": Is it a surprise that the left spend their entire lives being confused about what is in their underwear and what it is used for ?
From CNN:
“It’s not possible to know a person’s gender identity at birth, and there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth,” Cole asserted, in a statement better fit for an unhinged opinion article than a news article by a breaking-news reporter.
CNN is a parody website pic.twitter.com/djUrqI0jlt
— B (@aheapofthings) March 30, 2021 In fact, as most of us are willing to acknowledge, for all of human history we’ve all relied upon a very simple way of actually knowing sex at birth.
There is indeed consensus for knowing biological sex at birth: just gotta look between the legs, it's really not that hard.