I don't want stupid people reproducing.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Earth is not overpopulated.
only with evil people
Do you believe carbon is a pollutant or a natural part of the globe’s ecosystem?
Here’s an article from a former climate alarmist I recommend you take a look at. Here’s his bullet list from the article countering the religious dogma of environmentalists: Humans are not causing a “sixth mass extinction”
-The Amazon is not “the lungs of the world”
-Climate change is not making natural disasters worse
-Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003
-The amount of land we use for meat — humankind’s biggest use of land — has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska
-The build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more, and more dangerous, fires in Australia and California
-Carbon emissions are declining in most rich nations and have been declining in Britain, Germany, and France since the mid-1970s
-Netherlands became rich not poor while adapting to life below sea level
-We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter
-Habitat loss and the direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change
-Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels
-Preventing future pandemics requires more not less “industrial” agriculture
You are seriously brainwashed. Go to church. WAKE UP!
As population grows, technology has advanced in pace to keep up with the demand for resources. It’s very well possible by the time a trillion people are on this planet, we would have a way to manage it. Land would be more expensive and people may have smaller living quarters than now, but I’m not sure how you can define “overpopulated” without mentioning a lack of resources to provide for all.