I don't want stupid people reproducing.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Earth is not overpopulated.
only with evil people
Do you believe carbon is a pollutant or a natural part of the globe’s ecosystem?
Here’s an article from a former climate alarmist I recommend you take a look at. Here’s his bullet list from the article countering the religious dogma of environmentalists: Humans are not causing a “sixth mass extinction”
-The Amazon is not “the lungs of the world”
-Climate change is not making natural disasters worse
-Fires have declined 25% around the world since 2003
-The amount of land we use for meat — humankind’s biggest use of land — has declined by an area nearly as large as Alaska
-The build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explain why there are more, and more dangerous, fires in Australia and California
-Carbon emissions are declining in most rich nations and have been declining in Britain, Germany, and France since the mid-1970s
-Netherlands became rich not poor while adapting to life below sea level
-We produce 25% more food than we need and food surpluses will continue to rise as the world gets hotter
-Habitat loss and the direct killing of wild animals are bigger threats to species than climate change
-Wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels
-Preventing future pandemics requires more not less “industrial” agriculture
Sorry I think I just forgot to paste it.
https://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2020/6/29/on-behalf-of-environmentalists-i-apologize-for-the-climate-scare
You are seriously brainwashed. Go to church. WAKE UP!
"90 percent of the continental United States’ indigenous forest have been already cut down."
Fact source this and I will continue a conversation with you.
As population grows, technology has advanced in pace to keep up with the demand for resources. It’s very well possible by the time a trillion people are on this planet, we would have a way to manage it. Land would be more expensive and people may have smaller living quarters than now, but I’m not sure how you can define “overpopulated” without mentioning a lack of resources to provide for all.