Who is he exactly? I keep seeing his name.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Yeah it's not a show designed for serious anons but it is a good introduction and not nearly as negative as I would expect from HBO. I dont think they made definite predictions of who Q is but they speculate and investigate. Its the best main stream source of Q at the moment, incase anyone still has normie friends that need to see it on TV to believe
It's a hit piece that just does subtle jabs instead of outright bashing, I would not recommend this to anyone. Theres plenty of other videos to share with the normies.
doesnt sound like youve watched it, thanx for shit posts - the OP asked about ron watkins. if you expect a fully 100% pro-Q show on mainstream liberal HBO you are not realistic; they need to maintain a sense of skepticism to appeal to people who are skeptical.
Actually I have watched it. I do apologize for having such high expectations as to only recommend shows that are realistic. Others may agree, as I was not the one who downvoted you. I would wager you downvoted me, but thats just me being skeptical.
It's a 100% realistic show that gives an overview of Q and the Watkins and allows both pro Q and very weak anti-Q commentary. (The anti Q columnist on the show went to comet ping pong)
You do not have "high" expectations. You have incredibly unrealistic and naive expectations of what a liberal mainstream show can, and is allowed to show.
If you expect MSM to air shows like "fall of the cabal" that make wild claims with scarce evidence, based on vague Q posts.. they would probably end up in court forced to prove they had reason to believe it was true.