I think this is an unlikely scenario. What if they make a super deadly new pathogen emerge that is designed for that vaccine. So everybody without the vaccine gets super sick and likely dies. That way the people that easily trust and submit to their system is the ones who survive and most of the opposition is gone. People would be like OMG this vaccine is what save half the country and we have to take these otherwise we could die. It would be an effective way for them to take over and start a population that will submit to their plan is the part of the population they can use for their agenda.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I have an odd vaccine theory myself. Remember how "they" tried to come up with vaccines for SARS, MERS and other like diseases but, after getting the "vaccine" the animals being tested had bad reactions and most died? The vaccines were a failure, right? What if they weren't a failure, what if the results were exactly what "they" wanted?
"Most" did not die. There was a single one where all the animals died, however there have been many coronavirus experiments and on average this pathogenic priming effect caused about 5% of vaccine recipients to die. 5% of the 3B or so that will get the vaccine is brutal, but its not a depopulation level event. If these vaccines caused this effect in more than 5% of the recipients we would already know.
They don't die immediately. The plan is probably to release the worst virus that will destroy everyone that is pathogenicly primed (no functioning immune system).
God save humanity.
Do you have a link for the 5% number? I’ve seen several studies. One, like you mentioned, had almost total lethality. Another, had 25-35%.
Thank you.
You completely missed my point but, hey, Thanks for playing!
In what way did I miss your point? You said "most died". I've looked at numerous coronavirus vaccine papers going back decades. On average it was about 5%. If your downstream point was based on the false premise of "most" then the downstream point is at least as off as the premise was off.
I get that you wanted to point to pathogenic priming being an intended effect. I was pointing out that as bad as that effect has been shown to be (and 5% is really fucking bad), it wasn't as bad as you were suggesting.
I wasn't wanting to point to anything. All I did was respond to someone's theory with my own. It's just a theory, along with all the other theories on GW. My point was, what if the failed vaccine tests on animals wasn't what we were led to believe, that the "failed" tests weren't necessarily a failure for the Cabal, that they used the information gained from the "failures" to tweak the "vaccines" into something more useable for their purposes. That, maybe, just maybe, the scientists involved weren't really trying to find something effective against Sars/Mers/Covid. That, possibly, the animal testing was to see what a mRNA "vaccine" could really do to a mammal. It's great that you have read a bunch of literature on this subject, literature that is, quite possibly, not telling the whole story. And, while there are plenty of recent examples of what can happen to someone after getting inoculated, the long term effects are largely unknown to us. Plenty of theories there, too. But, I would bet that "they" already know because of the knowledge gained from the "failed" tests. Again, just a theory. Have a Great Day!
which is? I think they tested this on their Chinese internment prisoners of this covid and vaccine first.