Any site that does not source their work, link to sources, and at the very least NAME their sources is worthless as a news source, regardless of the brand name or the contents of their story.
If they do name or link to sources, you better check those sources to make sure the source is credible and that their context was not misrepresented before you even begin to entertain the idea that the news source is reporting news instead of posting fan fiction or disinformation.
As for tabloids, at this point I don't know that they were actually bad reporting. In some cases I think they might have been the only honest reporting.
Any site that does not source their work, link to sources, and at the very least NAME their sources is worthless as a news source, regardless of the brand name or the contents of their story.
If they do name or link to sources, you better check those sources to make sure the source is credible and that their context was not misrepresented before you even begin to entertain the idea that the news source is reporting news instead of posting fan fiction or disinformation.
As for tabloids, at this point I don't know that they were actually bad reporting. In some cases I think they might have been the only honest reporting.
well now,...they did site Guido
Another spoofer.
No way...Dude has the mask and everthing!