Not related to any recent event ... I was just scrolling through qanon.pub, and this popped out. Full text of the paragraph (of the first link of post 4857):
"
However, even if actors did achieve such an impact, the public should be
aware that election officials have multiple safeguards and plans in place—
such as provisional ballots to ensure registered voters can cast ballots, paper
backups, and backup pollbooks—to limit the impact and recover from a
cyber incident with minimal disruption to voting.
"
Now, at the time I initially read this, my focus was on possible disruptions to the LIVE vote (in order to prevent conservatives from voting, and the paper ballots dominating). HOWEVER, it now occurs to me that if they have backup pollbooks, couldn't the reported voter rolls be cross-checked against the backups? Wouldn't this at least reveal the fake voters created during the counting when the monitors were kicked out (or kept at such a distance that they couldn't observe)?
Granted, if the DS cooked the back-up books also, this wouldn't work ... but they've made so many mistakes at the granular level, what are the odds that some backups were burned to a CD and forgotten about in some of the smaller counties? Any bets on if they got to absolutely ALL of the backups?
Bush nazi appointee to Homeland Security, and CISA head Christopher Krebs was the lead man in charge of election cyber security. But, as anyone with half a brain could expect, the republican establishment [Bush nazi] traitor did what traitors always do, and publicly professed that the 2020 election was "the most secure election in American history." Foxes guarding the hen house. So, go figure.
You’re right, but don’t you also think the NSA or MI knows everything? Probably because of some technicality what they know can’t be admitted into a court filing. Q made the point in post 4688 the main fraud focus would be non-digital. However, these machines were connected to the internet even though they shouldn’t have been. Remember Colonel Waldron had a team capturing data packets from voting machines.
These voting machines create and store an image of the ballots scanned. It seems highly possible the NSA or MI could analyze these images and determine which are real and which are fake. Remember Jovan Pulitzer’s examples of how to tell the difference? If he can do it they can do it and probably already have.
Also, in the call POTUS had with Raffensberger, POTUS says at one point he knows things about the machines that would shake up the world. He also clearly knew other things and was putting the Georgia Secretary of State team in a position where they had to come clean or lie directly to the President.
Just an educated guess, but what has happened since November 3rd has been orchestrated so the evidence of fraud is irrefutable to include coming from sources a court cannot block on technicality. Also, as Rudy said in late November people denying the fraud had to be prepared to accept the actual results of the election.
Not related to any recent event ... I was just scrolling through qanon.pub, and this popped out. Full text of the paragraph (of the first link of post 4857):
" However, even if actors did achieve such an impact, the public should be aware that election officials have multiple safeguards and plans in place— such as provisional ballots to ensure registered voters can cast ballots, paper backups, and backup pollbooks—to limit the impact and recover from a cyber incident with minimal disruption to voting. "
Now, at the time I initially read this, my focus was on possible disruptions to the LIVE vote (in order to prevent conservatives from voting, and the paper ballots dominating). HOWEVER, it now occurs to me that if they have backup pollbooks, couldn't the reported voter rolls be cross-checked against the backups? Wouldn't this at least reveal the fake voters created during the counting when the monitors were kicked out (or kept at such a distance that they couldn't observe)?
Granted, if the DS cooked the back-up books also, this wouldn't work ... but they've made so many mistakes at the granular level, what are the odds that some backups were burned to a CD and forgotten about in some of the smaller counties? Any bets on if they got to absolutely ALL of the backups?
Bush nazi appointee to Homeland Security, and CISA head Christopher Krebs was the lead man in charge of election cyber security. But, as anyone with half a brain could expect, the republican establishment [Bush nazi] traitor did what traitors always do, and publicly professed that the 2020 election was "the most secure election in American history." Foxes guarding the hen house. So, go figure.
You’re right, but don’t you also think the NSA or MI knows everything? Probably because of some technicality what they know can’t be admitted into a court filing. Q made the point in post 4688 the main fraud focus would be non-digital. However, these machines were connected to the internet even though they shouldn’t have been. Remember Colonel Waldron had a team capturing data packets from voting machines.
These voting machines create and store an image of the ballots scanned. It seems highly possible the NSA or MI could analyze these images and determine which are real and which are fake. Remember Jovan Pulitzer’s examples of how to tell the difference? If he can do it they can do it and probably already have.
Also, in the call POTUS had with Raffensberger, POTUS says at one point he knows things about the machines that would shake up the world. He also clearly knew other things and was putting the Georgia Secretary of State team in a position where they had to come clean or lie directly to the President.
Just an educated guess, but what has happened since November 3rd has been orchestrated so the evidence of fraud is irrefutable to include coming from sources a court cannot block on technicality. Also, as Rudy said in late November people denying the fraud had to be prepared to accept the actual results of the election.