They changed their symbol because it might be offensive, while acknowledging that the only thing it has in common with an offensive symbol is that it's a tree? Would a palm tree be a bad choice too?
And the article wasn't published on the 1st, either, so not for the keks...
Ok what if... they needed an excuse? I looked up some images of common Oregon evergreen trees and if you were going to lynch someone those trees are a bad choice as they have branches all the way down unless someone bothered to remove them. So could the news here be getting to them, unwanted attention brought to the word evergreen? I don't really know, another far more likely explanation is lots of people in Oregon smoke too much weed.
They changed their symbol because it might be offensive, while acknowledging that the only thing it has in common with an offensive symbol is that it's a tree? Would a palm tree be a bad choice too?
And the article wasn't published on the 1st, either, so not for the keks...
This is downright confusing.
Ok what if... they needed an excuse? I looked up some images of common Oregon evergreen trees and if you were going to lynch someone those trees are a bad choice as they have branches all the way down unless someone bothered to remove them. So could the news here be getting to them, unwanted attention brought to the word evergreen? I don't really know, another far more likely explanation is lots of people in Oregon smoke too much weed.