840 Posobiec: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech and that Section 230 is unconstitutional (twitter.com) ? B O O M ! ? posted 3 years ago by sleepydude 3 years ago by sleepydude +842 / -2 116 comments share 116 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Vague is enough to strike it down. Courts can do that, it's up to legislation to write not vague laws
If our current Legislation was tasked to write a new Sec 230, they would only further enshrine the very things we want done away with.
A new car might not be better than the old if it was designed by a sadistic psychopath.
At least when you expose a tigers teeth people start to realize it's going to eat them