And then you have conflicting supreme court cases, even recently, like Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
Personally, I think companies should be shielded from government interference. IMHO, it's better to get off Twitter and Facebook in the first place. 230 helps every internet company with user generated content, whether it is alt tech, big tech, or tiny tech. Make too many changes to it, and you basically hurt the rest of us (including this web site for example).
Make it more costly to do business, well, it probably helps big tech the most since they can afford enough lawyers. I remember when the CDA was struck down in the first place, it was the first time much of the web had a blackout protest, I think you'd be surprised who joins in if 230 was in threat of a change.
And then you have conflicting supreme court cases, even recently, like Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
Personally, I think companies should be shielded from government interference. IMHO, it's better to get off Twitter and Facebook in the first place. 230 helps every internet company with user generated content, whether it is alt tech, big tech, or tiny tech. Make too many changes to it, and you basically hurt the rest of us (including this web site for example).
Make it more costly to do business, well, it probably helps big tech the most since they can afford enough lawyers. I remember when the CDA was struck down in the first place, it was the first time much of the web had a blackout protest, I think you'd be surprised who joins in if 230 was in threat of a change.