Criticism is never about helping. It's about attacking and tearing down. A smart and reasonable person should the know the difference between criticism (what unhelpful people do) and a critique (what helpful people do). A smart and reasonable person knows when to stand their ground and defend their work. People who do criticism are weak and insecure. They aren't there to advise. They are there to tear down and be nasty. If their goal was helping they'd actually say what and how they thought something could be improved.

A critique involves actually reading and analyzing a work to see what it did right and what it did right.

Although "You're highlighting doesn't really form connections" is an actual critique that's fair, your attacks against are not. Why do you feel the need to add personal attacks? What did I do to you? You jumped into the situation and assumed I was the villain.

You could just said "You're red highlighting doesn't really" and left it at that. It could have given stuff to think about. Instead you add bizarre and unprovoked attacks because you want to pick a side (that game is long how the Deep State has controlled the sheep) without assessing the real situation.

Why? What was your goal? To upset me for analyzing Gamestop? You didn't like how I did it? The other commenter did not offer a critique. They criticisized. There is zero helpful feedback there, yet you side with them and resort to name calling rather than just honest feedback.

A truly smart and reasonable person would know better.