Woman posts "better days are coming" after getting the vax. Dead four days later
(media.patriots.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (95)
sorted by:
Where's the proof? To even have a chance at knowing the state of her organs and chemistry at time of death would require an immediate autopsy, and that requires finding a medical examiner to do it. I did that at out ten years ago and it cost $5000. How many families are going to do that? Most aren't that eager to dissect their relative either.
Today's autopsy would be more. A good thorough autopsy knowing questions beforehand, that you're investigating possible autoimmune and whatever else, would require complicated tests on all organs with reagents and equipment that are expensive. Special handling, electron microscopy, instrumentation.....all that is not cheap. And finding a willing pathologist with the academic infrastructure to get all this done, without bias. Any multi-patient study on post mortem would need this, and the funding to do it if part of a study. Now try to find someone willing to fund this......this is why there are few clinical trials on vitamins and non-profit making therapies, or therapies not sold by the usual suspects.
Yes, I'm it would be more. And cash in front. The ME works for the county and moonlights doing private autopsies. I was referred to this ME by solid sources. The ME didn't go that deep with the micro level but did answer some major questions. I feel it was worth it and would do it again if I thought a vaccine killed my loved one.
So it depends what the questions are beforehand. In a 'regular' autopsy, you might just be looking for heart attack and vascular issues, or spread of cancer that caused the death. That investigation is simpler than looking for autoantibodies etc and doing special stains on multiple tissues, sometimes using special microscopes and techniques.
All those extras are expensive, and like everything else, getting them isn't promoted. But if we knew just a few critical questions to ask it wouldn't be necessary to do everything. That's the problem, what are we looking for that is definitive? Or will it have to be a more probabilistic determination based on a cluster of findings?