I have seen plenty of compelling evidence that SARS-cov-2 causes a unique set of conditions that are called Covid-19. I have also seen plenty of evidence that the sickness from the various influenza viruses have been misdiagnosed as Covid-19. The evidence suggests almost all cases of the flu have been misdiagnosed.
When you give a hospital $13,000 every time you misdiagnose something, they are going to do so. When you give them a fault ridden test for coronavirus that is wrong more often than it is right, predominantly in one direction (false positive) hospitals are further encouraged to misdiagnose.
So I believe you are both right and wrong. The flu is now called Covid-19, and so is the sickness from SARS-cov-2.
There is so much BS with the bad PCR test, no-one testing for the flu, and categorizing "with" C19 as "from" C19 on death certs, and all the rest, that a VERY VERY STRONG argument can be made that there is not even such a thing as C19.
Now, there probably IS, and it's probably a lab created virus and is most likely a biological attack - by china (and the dems) to destroy the USA and stop Trump.
But my position is still sound - you can argue very well that it isn't even a thing - at ALL.
So just like so many other times - David Icke was right all along. LOL.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.
Here are labs that have specifically stated they have isolated it. This is a small sample of those available.
This again is a very small sampling of what's available.
There have been many tests on this virus and its effects. It is much more likely that it is real, than that thousands of scientists are all complicit in an elaborate scheme to make it all up.
I believe the scam was not in the existence of the virus, but in how virulent it was. That is a much easier scam to pull off. All you need to do is:
create a test that produces a lot of false positives (PCR test with too many cycles: Check)
incentivize hospitals to lie (Give each hospital $13,000 for each positive PCR test: Check)
incentivize hospitals to kill people (Give each hospital $39,000 for each person put on a ventilator which will kill them: Check).
Create hysteria in the population by introducing the virus into the vulnerable population and then setting up the treatment (ventilators) that will kill them (Aging population in Italy was the first credible report of massive amounts of death, along with "Wag the Dog" movies from China: Check)
Call all other illnesses Covid (Trivally easy with (1) and (2): Check)
Reinforce the fear with social policies. This is especially helpful if there is no proof that those policies work as it creates cognitive dissonance (Mask, social distancing and economic shutdown policies are all complete bullshit: Check)
Six steps and I just created a pandemic.
OR
I convince every biology researcher in the world to make up a fake virus AND do those six steps.
What my point is trying to convey is how ridiculously it has been overblown and overhyped and ruthlessly co-opted to gain power.
The hype and hysteria is SO OVERBLOWN it's like a lit cigarette in a forest fire.
In dark conditions a human eye can pick out a lit cigarette from a great distance.
But in a forest fire? Is there someone in there with a lit cigarette? You might KNOW there is someone in there, if you go looking really really hard, but as far as you can tell, you can make a strong argument that there IS NO-ONE IN THERE.
Just like the virus. The bullshit is so strong you can make logical arguments that it's not even real at all.
Perspective.
And, if the 94% figure of actually "died from" not "died with" is true - if something is 94% fake, is it even real?
Barely.
Why do I keep making this point?
They LOCKED HEALTHY PEOPLE IN THEIR HOMES. FOR NO REASON.
THEY CRASHED THE GLOBAL ECONOMY. FOR NO REASON.
THEY'VE TRAUMATIZED MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. FOR NO REASON. People are scared shitless, they think they're gonna die. They think their death is around every corner.
There are people still, in a state with a rescinded mask mandate, walking around outside on a sunny day with a mask on. These people see a mother and small child walk out of a store with no masks on and stop short, step back and glare daggers at them because they think these people LITERALLY WANT TO KILL THEM BECAUSE THEY AREN'T WEARING A MASK.
This is mind control. This is brainwashing.
And it's for something that's 94% bullshit. In my book, that's basically complete bullshit.
You're not wrong per se, but when you say "it's not real" its trivially simple to shut you down, diluting everything you want to say, and all evidence you want to present.
If you start with, "it's been overblown" then you can't be refuted out of the gate. Each piece of evidence can support or not support that statement on its own merits and the argument still remains strong.
In the first case, it only takes ONE piece of evidence to fall apart to destroy the statement. In the second case EVERY piece of evidence must be refuted.
I have seen plenty of compelling evidence that SARS-cov-2 causes a unique set of conditions that are called Covid-19. I have also seen plenty of evidence that the sickness from the various influenza viruses have been misdiagnosed as Covid-19. The evidence suggests almost all cases of the flu have been misdiagnosed.
When you give a hospital $13,000 every time you misdiagnose something, they are going to do so. When you give them a fault ridden test for coronavirus that is wrong more often than it is right, predominantly in one direction (false positive) hospitals are further encouraged to misdiagnose.
So I believe you are both right and wrong. The flu is now called Covid-19, and so is the sickness from SARS-cov-2.
There is so much BS with the bad PCR test, no-one testing for the flu, and categorizing "with" C19 as "from" C19 on death certs, and all the rest, that a VERY VERY STRONG argument can be made that there is not even such a thing as C19.
Now, there probably IS, and it's probably a lab created virus and is most likely a biological attack - by china (and the dems) to destroy the USA and stop Trump.
But my position is still sound - you can argue very well that it isn't even a thing - at ALL.
So just like so many other times - David Icke was right all along. LOL.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
For example:
Here are labs that have specifically stated they have isolated it. This is a small sample of those available.
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida
NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories
University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)
McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research
Here are electron microscopy images of the virus.
India's first positive test
Cell culture viral isolate
Pictures at various stages of cell/viral body fusion
A close up
This again is a very small sampling of what's available.
There have been many tests on this virus and its effects. It is much more likely that it is real, than that thousands of scientists are all complicit in an elaborate scheme to make it all up.
I believe the scam was not in the existence of the virus, but in how virulent it was. That is a much easier scam to pull off. All you need to do is:
Six steps and I just created a pandemic.
OR
I convince every biology researcher in the world to make up a fake virus AND do those six steps.
Which one do you think is simpler?
well, you're not wrong, of course.
What my point is trying to convey is how ridiculously it has been overblown and overhyped and ruthlessly co-opted to gain power.
The hype and hysteria is SO OVERBLOWN it's like a lit cigarette in a forest fire.
In dark conditions a human eye can pick out a lit cigarette from a great distance.
But in a forest fire? Is there someone in there with a lit cigarette? You might KNOW there is someone in there, if you go looking really really hard, but as far as you can tell, you can make a strong argument that there IS NO-ONE IN THERE.
Just like the virus. The bullshit is so strong you can make logical arguments that it's not even real at all.
Perspective.
And, if the 94% figure of actually "died from" not "died with" is true - if something is 94% fake, is it even real?
Barely.
Why do I keep making this point?
They LOCKED HEALTHY PEOPLE IN THEIR HOMES. FOR NO REASON.
THEY CRASHED THE GLOBAL ECONOMY. FOR NO REASON.
THEY'VE TRAUMATIZED MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. FOR NO REASON. People are scared shitless, they think they're gonna die. They think their death is around every corner.
There are people still, in a state with a rescinded mask mandate, walking around outside on a sunny day with a mask on. These people see a mother and small child walk out of a store with no masks on and stop short, step back and glare daggers at them because they think these people LITERALLY WANT TO KILL THEM BECAUSE THEY AREN'T WEARING A MASK.
This is mind control. This is brainwashing.
And it's for something that's 94% bullshit. In my book, that's basically complete bullshit.
You're not wrong per se, but when you say "it's not real" its trivially simple to shut you down, diluting everything you want to say, and all evidence you want to present.
If you start with, "it's been overblown" then you can't be refuted out of the gate. Each piece of evidence can support or not support that statement on its own merits and the argument still remains strong.
In the first case, it only takes ONE piece of evidence to fall apart to destroy the statement. In the second case EVERY piece of evidence must be refuted.
Bottom line, pick the right hill to stand on.