And ill listen to any that can explain observed evidence and data from centuries of experiments that return consistent results. Until then, I'll continue to dismiss FET as CIA agitprop to discredit "conspiracy discovery" in general. I've yet to see anything to say it isn't.
Fyi - ill admit we still don't get gravity as a force. Quantum gravity research is a hot topic in physics. However, we do know planetary motion very well, and satellites rely on that info being true. We learned the reality of speed and how it affects the passing of time as a result as well.
The cabal did its best to claim the science proposed by Galileo was heresy, but it doesn't change the reality of what you can see in a telescope. Copernicus wouldn't publish his findings until after he died for fear of the cabal of his time (mostly the catholic church then).
You have to look at who was who, when they lived, to make any judgement based on trustworthiness, and these are well documented individuals who lived it. And given most of those names are now being muddied for the simple reason of "white old men", i think its safe to rely on their findings for now.
That isnt logic though, mate. Its ad hominem. "this guy did a bad thing, ergo x is false". Remember Q used the socratic method and critical thinking to give us the crumbs we needed. Logic is key.
Also hawking and NDgT didnt discover gravity and didnt come up the idea of orbits.
And ill listen to any that can explain observed evidence and data from centuries of experiments that return consistent results. Until then, I'll continue to dismiss FET as CIA agitprop to discredit "conspiracy discovery" in general. I've yet to see anything to say it isn't.
Fyi - ill admit we still don't get gravity as a force. Quantum gravity research is a hot topic in physics. However, we do know planetary motion very well, and satellites rely on that info being true. We learned the reality of speed and how it affects the passing of time as a result as well.
The cabal did its best to claim the science proposed by Galileo was heresy, but it doesn't change the reality of what you can see in a telescope. Copernicus wouldn't publish his findings until after he died for fear of the cabal of his time (mostly the catholic church then).
You have to look at who was who, when they lived, to make any judgement based on trustworthiness, and these are well documented individuals who lived it. And given most of those names are now being muddied for the simple reason of "white old men", i think its safe to rely on their findings for now.
That isnt logic though, mate. Its ad hominem. "this guy did a bad thing, ergo x is false". Remember Q used the socratic method and critical thinking to give us the crumbs we needed. Logic is key.
Also hawking and NDgT didnt discover gravity and didnt come up the idea of orbits.