You still have not refuted my claim that they have indemnity. And what does twitter have to do with anything?
Do you go around to doctors, lawyers and other professionals contending that they need to prove fundamental aspects of their topic areas to you?
I am a scientist. I do that all the time. You could even say its my whole life, so yes.
A persons profession is irrelevant. A persons argument is based on the argument, not their profession. I post things on my area of expertise all the time (cell and molecular biology, nanotechnology and physics, to a lesser extent computer science). I also worked in tax law for several years. I do not let those experiences dilute my argument. If my argument is insufficient, it is insufficient, regardless of past experience.
And so is yours.
I am not saying I am right, but you still have not provided evidence that I am wrong. You haven't even addressed my claim directly.
You still have not refuted my claim that they have indemnity. And what does twitter have to do with anything?
I am a scientist. I do that all the time. You could even say its my whole life, so yes.
A persons profession is irrelevant. A persons argument is based on the argument, not their profession. I post things on my area of expertise all the time (cell and molecular biology, nanotechnology and physics, to a lesser extent computer science). I also worked in tax law for several years. I do not let those experiences dilute my argument. If my argument is insufficient, it is insufficient, regardless of past experience.
And so is yours.
I am not saying I am right, but you still have not provided evidence that I am wrong. You haven't even addressed my claim directly.