KEK! Pfizer Vaccine Will "Most Likely Need" a Third Shot- CEO
(media.greatawakening.win)
? DEM PANIC ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
Mike Yeadon in a recent interview (I heard it on Delingpod, Apr 2) said that the variants can only be different by a few amino acids in a 10-20000 AA spike protein, so he doubted there was much to the variants not being recognized.
Here's what Yeadon said in an article: "The most changed variants are less than 0.3% different from the original sequence from Wuhan. So these are 99.7% identical to the original. It’s not possible that our bodies will not recognise every single variant as very close relatives of the original. No ones immune system will be fooled into thinking “this is a new virus, a new pathogen I’ve not seen before”. Ref:https://dryburgh.com/vanden-bossche-theory-fact-or-fiction/
I haven't read this entire article yet, as I was looking for reference to the topic of variant recognition by antibodies. Trying to find if natural vs vaccinated-person's antibodies recognize differently...I don't know. As you say: the question of whether vaccinated (with this CV shot) people have impaired/compromised immune systems or not is important to find out. We already suspect the spike protein that is produced is one culprit in the clotting problems (see article by Nuovo, Magro:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33360731/
Already there's a problem with the South African variant breaking through. Tests are showing that vaccinated people are more susceptible than unvaccinated. It's in peer review now. This is just the beginning.
You might be talking about this Israeli study: https://news.yahoo.com/south-african-variant-break-pfizer-200435213.html
I see another one in peer review that seems to say the SA variant (South African variant, B.1.351) is recognized equally by vacinees and recovered patients:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.27.433180v1.full.pdf "DISCUSSION The present study addresses a key knowledge gap pertaining to the potential of emergent SARS- CoV-2 variants to evade recognition by human immune responses. We focused on T cell responses elicited by either natural infection or vaccination with the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. We found negligible effects on both CD4+ or CD8+ T cell responses to all four variants investigated, to include the B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1 and CAL.20C variants found in the UK, South Africa, Brazil and California, respectively."
Now this is an in vitro study, and not measuring disease in actual patients. So the story is complicated, and so we'll leave it to the real (hopefully honest) scientists to make sure the studies are done and interpreted correctly and with minimal bias.
So I just want to add that while I'm NOT advocating for the shot (no way in heck!), if they're trying to tell people to now get a third shot, the study I posted seems to say they don't need it. (Now will start the stuff "oh, it only lasts 3 months, or 6 months....blah blah....")
I usually hold off opinion for a little while, let the media hype settle and the real scientists give an opinion. Then I'll listen. I haven't dug into the South African variant story to figure out if it's real or scare mongering.