Well. Having been a witness to billie's rise, and having had the misfortune of doing a contract with that creep in Silicon Valley, I'll express my honest opinion.
When IBM awarded microsoft the contract for DOS, there was a small competition between gates and Digital Research. DRDOS was already done, tested, and on the market from CPM80, easily converted to the 8088. Microsoft didn't even have an operating system. But... in doing some work for the clowns at the time, the word that circulated was that gates got in bed with the clowns in America, which pumped his company full on. Now, if you look at the mess windows has always had, that makes sense; it's easy to find holes to get into those systems. Further, since you all know (or should know) that facebook was the DARPA development "LifeLog", built to record/research those using it, it should be apparent that the combination of facebook and windows offers massive opportunities to catalog everyone using either.
So, I believe gates is in cahoots with clowns.
I might also add that if you look at the history of amazon, you'll find similar characteristics.
Absolutely. I think the only thing Microsoft ever truly created was the software user licence agreement, so you never actually own a copy of any software you buy.
Yup. The only one I bought that didn't have that was windows2000 pro. That didn't last long, it was way too secure. Also, wouldn't do gaming and such, so the cabal couldn't communicate through it. Also why I use linux.
DRDOS was my go-to over DOS. I liked OS2 over Windows too. I’m sure IBM was told to step-aside in the OS arena, but I don’t know or recall the whole-real story? But I lived it & used both.
DRDOS was much better; my go-to also. I also used Warp, still have that but don't use it any longer. Way better than windows. Only reason I had windows was to program stuff that was in that garbage.
Since I was mainly control systems of the military variety, I used a thing known as OS-9 and OS-9-68k. 9 was built for the 6809E Motorola and was PIC/PID; the intel cpus couldn't do that. 9-68k was for the 68000 series. OS-9 was basically a UNIX subset with its own superset commands for controls. It was a beautiful OS.
Absolutely!! Did a lot of work for outfits like Sandia, Ford Aerospace, Lockheed and the like. Very nice tech. Too bad the public can't have some of that too.
Well. Having been a witness to billie's rise, and having had the misfortune of doing a contract with that creep in Silicon Valley, I'll express my honest opinion.
When IBM awarded microsoft the contract for DOS, there was a small competition between gates and Digital Research. DRDOS was already done, tested, and on the market from CPM80, easily converted to the 8088. Microsoft didn't even have an operating system. But... in doing some work for the clowns at the time, the word that circulated was that gates got in bed with the clowns in America, which pumped his company full on. Now, if you look at the mess windows has always had, that makes sense; it's easy to find holes to get into those systems. Further, since you all know (or should know) that facebook was the DARPA development "LifeLog", built to record/research those using it, it should be apparent that the combination of facebook and windows offers massive opportunities to catalog everyone using either. So, I believe gates is in cahoots with clowns.
I might also add that if you look at the history of amazon, you'll find similar characteristics.
Absolutely. I think the only thing Microsoft ever truly created was the software user licence agreement, so you never actually own a copy of any software you buy.
Yup. The only one I bought that didn't have that was windows2000 pro. That didn't last long, it was way too secure. Also, wouldn't do gaming and such, so the cabal couldn't communicate through it. Also why I use linux.
DRDOS was my go-to over DOS. I liked OS2 over Windows too. I’m sure IBM was told to step-aside in the OS arena, but I don’t know or recall the whole-real story? But I lived it & used both.
DRDOS was much better; my go-to also. I also used Warp, still have that but don't use it any longer. Way better than windows. Only reason I had windows was to program stuff that was in that garbage.
Since I was mainly control systems of the military variety, I used a thing known as OS-9 and OS-9-68k. 9 was built for the 6809E Motorola and was PIC/PID; the intel cpus couldn't do that. 9-68k was for the 68000 series. OS-9 was basically a UNIX subset with its own superset commands for controls. It was a beautiful OS.
Nice...am familiar ?? Much of my computing experience was in target acquisition & resolution for intel. Amazing applications.
Absolutely!! Did a lot of work for outfits like Sandia, Ford Aerospace, Lockheed and the like. Very nice tech. Too bad the public can't have some of that too.