So many articles start off with a statement such as,
“…over 3000 tested, 712 cases tested positive for Sars-Cov-2 virus.”
Implying accuracy and relevancy in the PCR detecting a Sars-Cov2 virus infection.
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has still not been isolated!
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless
The lack of ability [zero] of the PCR test to detect Sars-Cov-2 infections should always be mentioned when talking about COVID-19 [Sars-Cov-2 ], especially if you want to call the positive tests 'CASES'.
Positive tests or, as they like to call them, 'CASES', have no meaning. They are pure propaganda.
The virus still has not been isolated and this should also be re-enforced.
Any article discussing the the Sars-Cov2 virus should start with:
“First of all, as we know, the Sars-Cov-2 virus has still not been isolated and therefore, there is no valid vaccine. Furthermore, the PCR tests are completely fraudulent and meaningless. That being said, here is....”
Yesterday there were posts on the efficacy of the Covid "vaccines." How can that even be determined with the ambiguity of PCR Tests? - very confused
They also use anti-body tests to determine coronavirus. I don't know if that data used the PCR test or the Ab test. The Ab test is substantially better than the PCR test (a very low bar) but is still error prone.
How do you test for anti-bodies for a virus that is not understood because it has never been isolated?