So many articles start off with a statement such as,
“…over 3000 tested, 712 cases tested positive for Sars-Cov-2 virus.”
Implying accuracy and relevancy in the PCR detecting a Sars-Cov2 virus infection.
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has still not been isolated!
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless
The lack of ability [zero] of the PCR test to detect Sars-Cov-2 infections should always be mentioned when talking about COVID-19 [Sars-Cov-2 ], especially if you want to call the positive tests 'CASES'.
Positive tests or, as they like to call them, 'CASES', have no meaning. They are pure propaganda.
The virus still has not been isolated and this should also be re-enforced.
Any article discussing the the Sars-Cov2 virus should start with:
“First of all, as we know, the Sars-Cov-2 virus has still not been isolated and therefore, there is no valid vaccine. Furthermore, the PCR tests are completely fraudulent and meaningless. That being said, here is....”
I agree that the PCR test is fraudulent on many levels. Such information needs to be exposed to the entire public, and its not even difficult to do since it has been admitted by blue-pilled "trusted" sources.
However, the "virus has not been isolated" narrative is, I believe, disinformation designed to discredit the skeptic and reinforce the fear narrative. (See below).
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
For example:
Here are labs that have specifically stated they have isolated it. This is a small sample of those available.
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida
NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories
University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)
McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research
Here are electron microscopy images of the virus.
India's first positive test
Cell culture viral isolate
Pictures at various stages of cell/viral body fusion
A close up
This again is a very small sampling of what's available.
There have been many tests on this virus and its effects. It is much more likely that it is real, than that thousands of scientists are all complicit in an elaborate scheme to make it all up.
I believe the scam was not in the existence of the virus, but in how virulent it was. That is a much easier scam to pull off. All you need to do is:
Six steps and I just created a pandemic.
OR
I convince every biology researcher in the world to make up a fake virus AND do those six steps.
Which one do you think is simpler?
Yesterday there were posts on the efficacy of the Covid "vaccines." How can that even be determined with the ambiguity of PCR Tests? - very confused
They also use anti-body tests to determine coronavirus. I don't know if that data used the PCR test or the Ab test. The Ab test is substantially better than the PCR test (a very low bar) but is still error prone.
How do you test for anti-bodies for a virus that is not understood because it has never been isolated?