If we are to believe there are a lot more of us than "them", why don't we just actively start canceling "them"? - The Great Awakening

If we are to believe there are a lot more of us than "them", why don't we just actively start canceling "them"?

posted 3 years ago by ConspiracyLinks 3 years ago by ConspiracyLinks +141 / -0

Just curious.

What would it take?

Who really is doing the canceling? Are these write-in campaigns? Protests? Seems to me the canceling only comes from the MSM...

We need to cancel THEM.

MAGA

26 comments

26 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (26)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– ConspiracyLinks [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Indeed, I don’t think profit is really part of the equation for them anymore, same for Pro-sports and other big companies. That’s why this has been mystifying, It goes against common sense. It is an indicator of what we are up against. This is a global machine only designed to CONTROL us. And guess what? It’s working. Just look around when you go out. Every mask is evidence.

My thinking upon this OP and upon insight and reflection here, is that we need to go after the heads (metaphorically speaking) of these sources, MSM, Sports and companies. Just like our politicians. Specifically they all need to be “canceled”.

We need public shaming of these people. Bigly. We need to make it personal. You can’t go after “Coca-Cola” me not drinking it my more will barley register. But if we can hold these company boards personally accountable, we could make inroads.

MAGA

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q