Unfortunately for you.. I could give two shits less about "Burden of Proof" If you can't take the time to research something on your own, then why take the time to pester the hell out of someone over something so basic? I just assumed that every adult human had taken a Biology class at some point in their life time. But hey, thats my fault for assuming your intelligence level was high.. I guess I give you guys way too much credit sometimes.
Hey man, if you're going to say it, you need to back it up.
It's called "the burden of proof".
The guy below me wasn't aware either. Why don't you go tear him a new asshole, dick.
Unfortunately for you.. I could give two shits less about "Burden of Proof" If you can't take the time to research something on your own, then why take the time to pester the hell out of someone over something so basic? I just assumed that every adult human had taken a Biology class at some point in their life time. But hey, thats my fault for assuming your intelligence level was high.. I guess I give you guys way too much credit sometimes.
Don't get salty and generalize this forum. We all come from different backgrounds here.
Burden of proof is Phil101, it's how constructive argumentation works. It's how the scientific method in Biology works.
You shouldn't assume anything. When you "assume", you make an "ass out of 'u and me' ".
Your hostile response indicated that you assumed my original comment is snarky. It's not. You could've answered my question without the attitude.
Seriously dude, whatever is wrong with your life, please go fix it.
Take a look in the mirror. No one is asking for your advice.
I'm not reading a 20lb biography full of excuses. There is no justified reason to react that way. Internet or not.