In these two threads yesterday, I ventured my assessment that the adrenochrome conspiracy-as-is-commonly-promoted on alt-sites such as this one is probably a blind alley we're being led into while the real ongoing Cabal "fountain of youth" -- fetal (and "partial-birth") stem-cell harvesting via the abortion industry -- is stiff-armed into the shadows.
Both of these sub-threads were deleted despite no visible negative feedback (i.e., no downvotes, 16 total upvotes), and at least one of the posts is about the subject and still is up (so I assume it's not a matter of being off-topic).
Appreciate mods looking into it. Thanks.
I don't really understand what you're asking, but no, stem-cell harvesting is not a forbidden topic.
If you wish to discuss adrenochrome, there is substantial evidence that it is not a red-herring.
If you wish to discuss (as a completely separate topic) stem-cell harvesting that sounds good to me if you have evidence to support such claims.
WRT stem-cells, the only way I can think of that they can be of use is if there is a genetic compatibility and they are surgically implanted. Such techniques are useful in various stem-cell therapies such as for Leukemia, and would almost certainly be useful for other situations as well, including overall regeneration or targeted healing of some organ.
Its not a trivial process though, and frankly, it would probably be better done from a persons own gametes to increase the probability of genetic compatibility.
For example, as a man you make some woman pregnant, wait for a few months until the cells have sufficiently differentiated, harvest the fetus and use those cells (if there is genetic compatibility). There is no reason to steal children for this purpose, and indeed, such an act would be less desirable since the genetic compatibility probability would be substantially reduced.
"stem-cell harvesting is not a forbidden topic." -- Good; I didn't think so.
"There is no reason to steal children for this purpose" -- There's no reason to steal children either for adrenochrome, a substance with a known chemical formula that can be, and is, made in a lab. It's not even illegal. (This is another tip-off that we're being led down the garden path away from "the real thing" (fetal and partial-birth organ harvesting for stem cells, among other potentially rejuvenative factors).
Toddlers do, however, possess an abundance of stem cells, and more of them, because they're bigger than infants.
Not true. There is substantial reason to steal children for adrenochrome.
Adrenochrome has been shown to be a mild hallucinogen. It is also implicated as being fundamental in schizophrenia. In addition to adrenochrome, there are many other useful molecules in blood, such as growth hormone agonists, other steroids, etc. In the blood of the young all of these molecules are substantially more prevalent. Drinking blood is also a viable way for these molecules to enter the body (bioavailability).
However, all those molecules are not the biggest reason they would want those children, and not lab made chemicals for this purpose imo.
Evidence suggests they have been using the ritual of child sacrifice and the drinking of blood (with all those juicy chemicals) as a ritual for thousands of years. The adrenochrome substantially enhances the experience of the ritual. It is addictive, which gives control of the ritual attendees. It is hallucinogenic, which adds to the potency and "magic" of the ritual, and it causes cognitive and ego disassociation (even MPD), which is very useful for making and maintaining the satanic mind. Think of it like all of MKUltra wrapped up in each child sacrifice.
They believe in ritual. They believe in magic. They believe in the power of this and they have been doing it for thousands of years. That is why they steal children; because it is their religion, more ancient than any other on earth.
As for stem cells, everyone has stem cells. Our stem cells are not worse than a child's. Children may have a higher percentage of less differentiated cells, but we all have stem cell niches. As we age we lose some stem cell niches due to damage that is incurred in surrounding cells. These damaged cells enter a state called senescence which is deleterious to the surrounding tissue. These cells are cleared by the immune system, but this clearance is reduced as our immune system ages. It is these senescent cells which can destroy the niches, and thus the stem cells.
However, we still have lots of stem cells. Adding more can certainly help, if the right type are added in the right place in the right way, but it isn't a simple process, and genetic compatibility is essential. Like I said, you are better off cloning yourself or having a baby and harvesting the stem cells after they have formed niches and sufficiently differentiated, or perhaps even harvesting pluripotent cells from embryo clones and implanting those.
I really don't think the stem cell theory holds much weight. They have been doing these things forever. The stem cell harvesting and implantations would be a very new technique (not from ancient rituals). It would be limited by compatibility issues, and there are far easier ways to accomplish the harvesting of compatible stem cells than from random children, which could never be 100% like these other, simpler ways.
"There is substantial reason to steal children"
-- There are many reasons to steal children that actually make some sense. Extortion, and the sort of Cabal initiation-ritual that Lin Wood relayed.
"...for adrenochrome."
-- Thus the "conspiracy" angle we're discussing.
"Adrenochrome has been shown to be a mild hallucinogen. It is also implicated as being fundamental in schizophrenia. In addition to adrenochrome, there are many other useful molecules in blood, such as growth hormone agonists, other steroids, etc. In the blood of the young all of these molecules are substantially more prevalent. Drinking blood is also a viable way for these molecules to enter the body (bioavailability)."
-- That is a big paragraph full of assertions without a link to anything (and if some are submitted, I'll lay good odds they're to hysterical videos and similar page that basically bounce off each other, but never reference actual tests proving anything.
"I really don't think the stem cell theory holds much weight. "
-- Taxpayer funded abortion for body parts is the sacred billion-dollar golden calf that Fabian-socialism labored the better part of a century to secure. Search "value human fetal parts" in your favorite engine. This is a gargantuan industry.
I had been hoping to inspire you to do some research yourself, because that is the best way to learn, but I understand some direction is sometimes necessary. Here is something to start this rabbit hole.
I am a scientist. I rarely link to anything but science papers. In this case there has not been as much research as I would like, though you can probably imagine that if the assertions are true, it would be very unlikely to be a topic of research that would get a lot of funding.
There are lots of reasons, and stem cells may be one of them, though there are many other reasons for fetal tissue as well besides stem cells. Indeed, from what I have seen full organs are what seems to be important. That would be totally unnecessary if stem cells were the goal.
My perspective however is as a biologist (among other things) that has spent a fair bit of time researching stem cells and the causes of aging. My thinking is from reading many papers on what experiments have been done, and what technologies exist. Are there things I haven't seen? Possibly. Probably. But I've read a lot of papers on these topics. My protests come from having designed experiments to improve health span myself, and having studied the work of others in the field. There are easier ways.
Much easier ways.
Its also a very new technology. You seemed to dismiss that essential part of my argument. The stealing, sacrifice, and consumption of children has been going on for all of human history on a scale large enough to have a tremendous amount of our art, written history and religious texts inundated with the stories of it. They weren't stealing children for their stem cells then, and I don't think that is a primary reason for stealing them now.
Again, there are much easier ways to get genetically compatible stem cells for age related therapies.
"I had been hoping to inspire you to do some research yourself"
Do not assume that I have not done so.
"Again, there are much easier ways to get genetically compatible stem cells for age related therapies."
And was stated previously stated, adrenochome is a chemical that can be manufactured industrially ("much easier way"). If it actually did what is claimed if it, there'd be no need for murdering children to get it, at least not since it was first synthesized at any rate.
Did you not read my reasons? It seems like you did not if you are bringing up chemical synthesis again.
First:
Of course all of these can be synthesized, and if you are thinking of pure money, then perhaps it is cheaper this way (though perhaps not in reality, since children are not actually that expensive since you get a five finger discount on every single one).
This is the really important point that you have not yet addressed, and is the crux of my argument.
Emphasis added for well, emphasis. These are very important reasons. Your price protest is based on what? The price set by those who created the rituals thousands of years ago and set the prices for everything on the planet at a whim?
if you believe the blood holds magic, would you want independently synthetically created chemicals (which are only cheap if you have an industrial setup to create them, its not actually that easy). Or would you want the blood. The magic. The religious communion.
Economic theory that only thinks of money is a failed economic theory, every single time.
"In addition to adrenochrome, there are many other useful molecules in blood, such as growth hormone agonists, other steroids, etc. ...Of course all of these can be synthesized"
--In addition to the specific namesake compound, "adrenochrome" serves as a layman's term for the rest of the smorgasbord cocktail found in blood which is of purportive use. As since the invention of the labratory centrifuge and modern chemistry, everything can be isolated and manufactured separately.
"Of course all of these can be synthesized, and if you are thinking of pure money, then perhaps it is cheaper this way"
--I'm thinking in terms of RISK. If there's a "fountain of youth" to be obtained from drinking blood, just about any blood should do. You shouldn't need the human blood of children. If it's consumed (drank), it's broken down by stomach acids anyway.
On the other hand, if murdering a child is required for a Cabal initiation ritual, submitting to being filmed raping and then shooting a victim (per Lin Wood's relayed accusation) makes a lot more sense than an elaborate system of harvesting the blood of tortured kids and then refining it to dole out. (Anything unrefined would spoil pretty quickly.)
"They believe in ritual. They believe in magic. They believe in the power of this"
--I think that a lot of people believe that they believe, and maybe they did once upon a time. But in the 20th century (at least), the Cabal transformed into a well-oiled machine based on control of information and extortion. The idea that they'd permit an enormous, ongoing security flaw in the form of herding masses of children around for blood-harvesting to slake the thirst of legions of minions is comic-book material. I could see having to eat a kid as a one-timer to elevate to the top level of the pyramid, but congressional clowns and Hollywood thralls? No way; certainly not in the surveillance era. There's "these people are stupid", and things that are so dumb that they exclude you from homo-sapiens, let alone being smart enough to successfully rule the world for centuries.
Nope not verboten
So long as you persist in your denials of adrenochrome harvesting, you will not see that both stem cell AND adrenochrome harvesting are done by the Morlocks. Open up to the harshest reality EVER..
"So long as you persist in your denials of adrenochrome harvesting"
I am NOT denying that babies are being killed, as is plainly obvious in the OP. Why are you trying to gaslight the reading audience into assuming otherwise, Mr. not-a-mod-and-has-no-post-count?
Better to have a no post score than a history of obtuse reactionary bickering.
At this point I will accuse you of being a gaslighting troll bearing false-witness. You are doing the exact thing that you accuse me of doing. (And... archived.)
plz stop complaining about your vage theorie which you didnt fully formulate not getting much traction youre acting like a libtard yo!
You're acting like an ESL hired troll. All aboard the gaswagon-express to protect Margaret Sangar's abomination at all costs.
I have 10K / 2.4K karma what are you on about?
Bandwagon fallacy. Any nominally-organized group of posters can ring-vote themselves into rock-stars. Your segue off-topic into shoot-the-messenger ad hominem is classic troll.
It's easy to create an "exciting" fiction (adrenochrome from children) that closely resembles a going-on-for-decades "boring" reality (the fetal tissue-harvesting industry), and steer everyone away from one into the other. They exhaust themselves researching the dead ends of the exiting fiction, and lose credibility when they can't prove any of it. Frazzledrip, for instance, has patriots everywhere diving into unsavory places in an attempt to confirm it; should they ever be arrested for anything, what do you supposed the prosecution will do with their browser's search-history? They'll be accused of "looking for child porn", that's what.
"The best way to control any individual in the Information Age is via temptation into self-discreditation."
Exercise OPSEC.