All this ranting because you're upset that my example is not absurd enough for you. You're making a mountain out of a molehill. That says a lot about you.
I don't think you even read nor understand my original comment in the slightest. You're basically ranting over things I never said. And then freaking out over that.
You're creating an entire argument in your head and screaming about that made-up argument in your mind.
So you think my example of a Leftist extreme strawmen was acceptable to normies? That they wouldn't reject that as absurd? That's actually good news. That means the normies are way more awake than any of us realized. I didn't realize you thought that.
The whole point of the example was showcasing what wouldn't be acceptable to normies. My example was not about what people on this site would accept. Almost everyone but you understood that point. I don't know why it went over your head.
My point was this is how the Left control the sheep. They say that to the sheep. This was especially true in the days of the Satanic Panic.
Now you're accusing me of being a shill while you get more and more shrill.
I'd say you have a real problem in how you deal with disagreement. There was no need to blow up and become rude. You could have just had a discussion with me. Instead you get angry and rude like all you want is a fight over something you have clearly misunderstood.
Again, the example was what the Left says to the NORMIES. Are you really going to argue that if you said that to the typical normie they'll go, "Oh! Of course! Why didn't I see it?"
It's sad that you can't see how you blew things out of proportion.
" For what it's worth, I apologize for coming across the way I did and using such strongly worded language."
Okay. That sounds good. And I'm sorry if I spoke too strongly to you. It's just that this site gets a lot of shills and when you go on the attack like you did right from the start the natural response is to think "Oh great, another shill".
It didn't need to escalate the way it did. I was open to discussion, but all I saw was how you attacked me for no reason. This is why it's easy for real shills to infiltrate us. Often users here make themselves sound no different than them.
How do we distinguish friend from foe?
"I mean no malice. I only care about the truth and sharing truth".
And that I respect. I wish you would have approached me with that tone. It would have saved us both a lot of unnecessary fighting.
Unfortunately it is so easy for shills to set us on each other because we often sound no different from them. We use their same language. This is something that commenters here need to think about. I fall for it too and my shields go up.
All this ranting because you're upset that my example is not absurd enough for you. You're making a mountain out of a molehill. That says a lot about you.
I don't think you even read nor understand my original comment in the slightest. You're basically ranting over things I never said. And then freaking out over that.
You're creating an entire argument in your head and screaming about that made-up argument in your mind.
So you think my example of a Leftist extreme strawmen was acceptable to normies? That they wouldn't reject that as absurd? That's actually good news. That means the normies are way more awake than any of us realized. I didn't realize you thought that.
The whole point of the example was showcasing what wouldn't be acceptable to normies. My example was not about what people on this site would accept. Almost everyone but you understood that point. I don't know why it went over your head.
My point was this is how the Left control the sheep. They say that to the sheep. This was especially true in the days of the Satanic Panic.
Now you're accusing me of being a shill while you get more and more shrill.
I'd say you have a real problem in how you deal with disagreement. There was no need to blow up and become rude. You could have just had a discussion with me. Instead you get angry and rude like all you want is a fight over something you have clearly misunderstood.
Again, the example was what the Left says to the NORMIES. Are you really going to argue that if you said that to the typical normie they'll go, "Oh! Of course! Why didn't I see it?"
It's sad that you can't see how you blew things out of proportion.
" For what it's worth, I apologize for coming across the way I did and using such strongly worded language."
Okay. That sounds good. And I'm sorry if I spoke too strongly to you. It's just that this site gets a lot of shills and when you go on the attack like you did right from the start the natural response is to think "Oh great, another shill".
It didn't need to escalate the way it did. I was open to discussion, but all I saw was how you attacked me for no reason. This is why it's easy for real shills to infiltrate us. Often users here make themselves sound no different than them.
How do we distinguish friend from foe?
"I mean no malice. I only care about the truth and sharing truth".
And that I respect. I wish you would have approached me with that tone. It would have saved us both a lot of unnecessary fighting.
Unfortunately it is so easy for shills to set us on each other because we often sound no different from them. We use their same language. This is something that commenters here need to think about. I fall for it too and my shields go up.