Look at this (circle) graph, update 4-16-21
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
To be fair, VAERS reports were determined to be monstrously underreported previously. I think that has changed for this vaccine. While it is still likely underreported, it is almost certainly not underreported by the 100 times it was before. If it was, every single person in the world would know someone who died from the vaccine.
In other words this data could be from a more deadly vaccine, or it could be from a change in percentage of reports. It could be both (most likely imo). Regardless, this data is almost certainly not a good set for analysis or meaningful conclusion.
While I agree with most of your assertions, do you have a better dataset to use?
I'm not saying don't use it at all. I just think it can't be compared to previous years with making these essential stipulations.
The real conclusions to take away from this are:
The last is very interesting to me. Why would these reports increase? What measures were taken to increase the numbers? Who would want people to see how deadly they are? Who is really in control?
I can’t find any reference to changes in reporting protocols on the vaers website. I assumed there was a change, but can’t find it.
My oppinion is that reporting has increased due to the hightened awareness, but I don’t know how much.
I also was unable to find changes in reporting protocols. I will admit my search was not as thorough as it could have been though (don't care that much/too much shit to do).
This may well be the case, but we also almost certainly have Patriots who are actively trying to wake people up. Increasing vaccine reports would do that, so it's difficult to think they aren't actively engaged in this.