As we all know:
-
The PCR tests are completely fraudulent and meaningless
-
The Sars-Cov-2 virus has not been isolated and therefore, there is no valid vaccine
[a fact, not a belief]
NSFW IF: Your company believes the Sars-Cov-2 virus has been isolated and the vaccine is valid and that the PCR tests are accurate.
[a belief, not a fact]
OK - Here is one of many published reports. This one presenting evidence from Dr Claus Köhnlein MD, Dr Samantha Bailey MD & Dr Stefano Scolgio BSc PhD.
Phantom Virus: In search of Sars-CoV-2
The following discusses the evidence needed to identify a virus. It has not been done, or if it has, the results are not public.
How are viruses discovered and identified in the first place?
“No need to isolate the new virus, we have its genetic sequence”
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell
Virus Isolated! NOT
I can do this forevver
SARS COV 2- Has Not Been Proven to Exist
Since their story can’t be backed up, there is no reason to believe in the existence of SARS-CoV-2.
The virus misconception is at the heart of Operation Coronavirus, because without the concept of germ theory and without the horror story of the killer virus, most people would not buy the NWO-directed official narrative of COVID propaganda. In a previous article on the nature of the virus, I have discussed the heroic efforts of German virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka, who won a landmark case in 2017 which went all the way to the German Supreme Court. Lanka proved in the highest court of the land that measles was not caused by a virus, and that there was in fact no such thing as a measles virus. Lanka is still busy working, and he wrote this article earlier this year (translated into English here) entitled ““The Misconception called Virus”” in which he explains the history of how mainstream science went horribly wrong with its conclusions (really assumptions) to demonize the humble virus and to falsely ascribe pathogenicity to it when there is none.
The Virus Misconception: The Killer Virus Story vs. Deficiency and Toxicity
Lanka’s main point throughout the article is this: when modern scientists are working with diseased tissue, they think the presence of a virus is causing the disease, instead of realizing that the tissue in question has been cut off and isolated from its host, then doused with antibiotics, and that this separation and poison make it diseased and kill it, rather than any virus. Lanka writes:
“All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations … All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, the infected cells and tissues were dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.”
” … the death of the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner when no “infected” genetic material is added at all. The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact. According to … scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out. In order to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called “virus propagation” … scientists would have had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substances … to the cell culture.”
“These control experiment have never been carried out by the official “science” to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with alleged “infected” material.”
In other words, the studied cells and tissues die with or without the presence of a virus in exactly the same way; therefore, the virus cannot be the cause of the morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, this exactly what many health experts have stated, namely that there are only 2 causes of disease: deficiency and toxicity. For instance, Charlotte Gerson (who took over running the Gerson Clinic from her brilliant father Max) said this about disease and cancer. Removing cells or tissue from the body and thus cutting them off from their energy/nutrient supply will quickly lead to deficiency; injecting antibiotics into the mixture is toxicity; thus there is no solid proof a virus is causing disease when there is already deficiency and toxicity present. This is the key point of the virus misconception.
How the Virus Misconception Has Roots in 1858 and Became Entrenched in 1954
Lanka traces back the development of the virus misconception to 1858 and to ... Continues: https://davidicke.com/2020/07/23/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-the-virus-misconception/
This is a belief, and is not supported by evidence I have seen and presented (which has yet to be actually refuted). To call it factual is farcical. This is how disinformation begins and discredits all actual facts.
If you have evidence to support it please do so. To make claims of "fact" on something for which you only have evidence is disinformation and a lie. Facts look like this:
"Person A made the claim that it has not been isolated (a fact). Person A has these credentials (a fact (hopefully)). I believe Person A (a fact)."
I listed 3 facts being presented as evidence. These pieces of evidence are facts. The conclusion that it has not been isolated is NOT a fact, but a decision you have made based on the evidence. Conclusion == belief. They are synonymous.
By stating a belief is not a belief but a fact you discredit your statements. You will increase the power of your voice by not making false claims (fact, not belief e.g.), even if you say the same thing.
Money offered for an Isolated Vaccine Sample
If you have the "evidence" present it and collect $1.2 Million
Where?
So far, all you've done is make assertions. Assertions, until supported by actual evidence, are really just beliefs masquerading as facts.
Two can play at that game.
Actually I provided biological evidence. You can look up all of the assertions I have made in any cell and/or molecular biology and/or molecular physiology textbook (depending on the assertion).
I am NOT going to go through textbooks to prove the assertions are standard knowledge in cell biology and/or physiology. If you wish to prove me wrong, please find anything that does so.
I am not making these statements from desire, but from memory and experience in actual scientific experiments in biology that I have personally done. Refute anything you want, but do it with science, not with "two can play that game".
When you get your Ph.D. in some biology field, come back and have a discussion with me based on memory and assertion without supporting evidence. Until then, provide support for your refutations and/or claims.
PCR tests are not completely fraudulent and meaningless in and of themselves. PCR tests are excellent used in scientific research and have a very high specificity in detecting RNA fragments.
They are misused for diagnosing illness or contagiousness, which the inventor himself has also stated. The case numbers they present from the PCR tests are fraudulent. When using a high Cycle Threshold, the number of false positives can be very high as well, since the test cannot distinguish between an active virus and a virus that has been defeated by the immune system.
Only if you also have the actual cycle count for each positive test, can you make any educated guess of the contagiousness of that individual.
Here's the inventor talking about it.
He says you can find anything in anything.
The PCR tests are completely fraudulent and meaningless for diagnosis of Sars-Cov-2
Better?
Close:
The PCR tests are perfect for detection of the Sars-Cov-2 virus.
The PCR tests, as they are used today, are completely fraudulent and meaningless for diagnosis of the COVID-19 disease.
Your statement is only correct if the virus has been isolated and the PCR is matched, exactly to the virus. It is not, ergo they are completely fraudulent and meaningless for diagnosis of Sars-Cov-2, which has not been isolated.
Millionaire offers $1.2 M reward to anyone providing an isolated sample of the COVID-19 virus