Genius and space are inverted
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Only those that directly impact the lives of others, against their will or input.
I'm fairly certain this qualifies as being something that directly impacts the lives of others against their will or input.
Its not so nuanced. Does it directly impact any persons own pursuit of life, liberty or happiness?
[Yes] [No]
If yes, find another way.
If no, proceed.
In what way does Neuralink fall into the "yes" category?
Everything you just said is a fear based prediction. It has nothing to do with reality. Every transformative technology has suffered similar fear based predictions. I am not suggesting we go blindly into transformative technologies with no caution. On the contrary, caution is how we have always survived every transformation. But every time we stifle innovation for fear, we lose humanity, not gain it. We ARE our innovation. That is what makes us human. Without that, we are... I don't know what we are, but we aren't human.
I suggest that there is nothing more shortsighted than purely speculative fear based decisions.
Fear should never do anything more than provide a path for a cautionary approach. It should never say "lets not go down this path" just because the lights aren't on.
We already have human/robot hybrids... Have you never seen an amputee?
Chimeras have been a thing for all of life on earth. Chimeras are not what you think.
Regardless of the technical term though, I can address it in spirit.
Such acts as creating hybrid life would almost certainly fall into the category of interfering with an individuals pursuit of life, liberty and happiness (the person being created). I'm not sure its a bad thing to be fair though. I think it would be cool to have wings for example, but that's just me, and I can certainly see an argument for this being unethical, and highly debatable within the conditions I suggested above as "allowable technology."
Introducing mosquitos with vaccines would be a direct violation of an individuals right to choose.
Again, this falls into a violation as stated above. This is a tool being used by evil people for evil purposes (at least as you have suggested it) and is a direct violation of an individuals pursuit of life, liberty and happiness.
If there is a reasonable objection as to why a certain tech would take away anyone's rights, then it should absolutely be discussed.
In truth, we already do that. This past couple decades that has gone lax in certain arena's and certain countries, but that relaxation is likely because we are in the Luciferian endgame. It is not an inherent flaw in the system of our ethics.
You said it well. Their proganda machine is outta control. Pretending we have a choice when in less than a year we wouldn’t have a choice in damn near anything.
Their 100 year experiment on humans psychological, trauma, sexual abuse, murder had gone on long enough. We are at our breaking point and they knew it would come to this. They had their endgame planned since the. 1954 Bilderburg meeting. The writing was on the wall so to speak. It’s the final countdown. We are getting a small preview of what kinda even bigger hell hole would’ve been like had we not fought back.