This. I think it was a purposeful move (likely someone else's call and they just told him to talk). Same with Waters. Why interject their opinion which may lead to a mistrial? Because the looting/burning can continue and the case can be tried again (vs not guilty) guaranteeing it never ends, thus continuing to use him and GF as pawns.
This. I think it was a purposeful move (likely someone else's call and they just told him to talk). Same with Waters. Why interject their opinion which may lead to a mistrial? Because the looting/burning can continue and the case can be tried again (vs not guilty) guaranteeing it never ends, thus continuing to use him and GF as pawns.