Digging into all the 10KM depth earthquakes (see Comment for more)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
With several earthquakes being shown at 10KM depth with alarming frequency, I decided to dig a little. I went to the USGS website and downloaded the earthquake data for the last 1 year. for depths between 8 & 12 Km's and magnitude between 2.5 to 7 on the Richter scale. I got 11324 results. When i apply ranges and keep 10 KM as a specific datapoint i get this most shocking result. This is not natural, and this many ? Are these all tactical nukes ?
Link - https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=-89.50704,-270&extent=89.50096,630&range=search&timeZone=utc&settings=true&search=%7B%22name%22:%22Search%20Results%22,%22params%22:%7B%22starttime%22:%222020-04-15%2000:00:00%22,%22endtime%22:%222021-04-22%2023:59:59%22,%22minmagnitude%22:2.5,%22maxmagnitude%22:7,%22mindepth%22:8,%22maxdepth%22:12,%22orderby%22:%22time%22%7D%7D
Not just several. There have been HUNDREDS of these around the world. There were 17 just the other day. All at 10m depth.
I think they are detonations registering as quakes. Blowing up tunnel systems. Been happening globally. Good news.
remember 11.11 i think 2019 when the earth "rang like a bell" and we still don't know why? I always thought that was intriguing too, almost like the good guys set off something that revealed the DUMBs. Like lit them up with vibrations or something.
All the DUMBs getting blasted?
That would be my guess.
There has probably been so much vile, evil things going on in them that they decided to just destroy them. Could any of this cause issues on the surface? Geofags please!
Sure hope we emptied all of OUR belongings out of them before they were blasted! We own every bit of it.
The count for the last 1 year is 8789 ( see table attached as a pic above)
It is estimated by William Cooper and others that there's in excess of 70+ DUMBs...JUST IN THE U.S. ALONE. That number includes possible DUMBS underneath overseas U.S. Military installations and other overseas U.S. Federal Govt bldgs, too. Some are said to be as big as cities, some may house aliens, and some may be joint alien-human ventures. I would imagine that just like not all U.S. Intel are traitors, not all DUMBs are [theirs] either. But I would assume, also, that
This could very well be "our" guys taking them out, one by one.
I have been monitoring quakes for 12 years now. I keep USGS and Global Incident open 24/7. I had this same eye opener in 2012. I built a spread sheet with over to 40,000 quakes between 2011 and 2013 between 1km and 10km. That's 100 entry points...1.1, 1.2, 1.3...etc. Instead of random distribution, 400 or so per data point, "5.0" depth quakes were recorded 13,800 times. I tried several routs to get this to the public including George Noory and Richard Hoagland. Looks like they are cleaning out lower levels. I bet its hot as hell down there.
Mapping the 10KM ones only you get this map. https://ibb.co/98yMQZh
After noting the locations on the map, I'm going to venture to say it'd be not feasible whatsoever to have any kind of base buried 6 miles deep directly on a fault line. There are faults every where all of the Earth, many even across just the USA. There'd be such extreme heat and variability in terms of movement and pressure that any "base" would be crushed, or at least a thin little access elevator (down 6 miles in length...) would be quickly made inaccessible by the processes of the Earth. I want to believe in DUMBs and that good guys are destroying them but in no way is an epicenter marked that deep on a fault line evidence of a base.
Also data filters could just be the result of estimation and programming. There may be a higher priority to label a weak signal at over 10km, pending certain factors. I highly doubt underground resolution at that depth is very good anyway. I've studied and have first hand experience doing some seismic surveys and even shallow depth seismic isn't quite the resolution you think it'd be. I could be all wrong and underestimate the power and complexity of the sensors being used here, but my analysis warns that you're putting too much faith in all of that data being correct to begin with.