Digging into all the 10KM depth earthquakes (see Comment for more)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
This has always been the most common depth, and if you were on the USGS site it says somewhere that estimating depth is hard, it's often off by a kilometer, and when they are in doubt they default to 10 km (which of course helps solidify 10 km as the most common depth. Where did this idea come from that there are tunnels this deep anyway? Why would anyone construct anything that deep, down in an unstable zone? How did these tunnel borers get deep enough in the first place to set off nuclear weapons without people noticing? When you think of all the crime that is done and gotten away with in ordinary basements, it seems pretty odd to try to go deeper than any known manmade shaft.
the earth has natural immense casms deep underground. We wouldnt need to construct one per se, just tunnel down to it.
Maybe we need someone who has more knowledge about this. there are depth errors defined for 10KM events as well as for others. The depth error is also not consistent and saying that it defaults to 10 always is also erroneous. There are differeneces in the depth errors as well.
However even if 10% of this number is accurate, that is still a lot.
COming to your point about the unstabale nature of these depths, the only available information is know what is called "known information" distributed by controlled groups.
I dont remember the exact number but at the last count 1000's of patents were classified. These are not tunnels made in the traditional ways IMO.
It's ridiculous to think nuclear blasts made tunnels. First there is the problem of getting enough bombs. Second, blasts are spherical, not directional. Third, people all over the world have been alert for signs of fission events since 1945 and they are probably getting good at it by now. Fourth, it would be so radioactive down there nothing could live. Fifth, it is hot down there aside from radiation. Sixth, fusion reactions might reduce the radiation but a cabal that had such technology could rule the world without hiding out in tunnels. Seventh, patents aren't products, you can patent ideas. I had a friend who patented an idea about getting unlimited energy from galactic spin. Here it is twenty years later and we still don't have it. This story of super deep tunnels is only believable if they were created thousands of years ago by aliens who for some reason prefer am extremely hostile environment.
Not to dismiss your other points, because they are in fact valid, but no you cannot patent an idea. Conceptual patents are meaningless and hold no weight whatsoever.
What do you think a person is patenting? They are patenting their idea. If they are smart they have a working prototype because it makes patenting their future developments or tweaks much easier. But a patent is literally intellectual property protection. https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/patent-law
They aren't "man made" and the "core" isn't even similar to what is taught is school. New models look like Dr. Seuss designed the damn thing.